Responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations
The article is focused on scientific problems of administrative law. The author analyzed the scientific notions of administrative responsibility. The author gave a definition of administrative responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations. The author identified specific features of administrative responsibility within banking operations. The article deals with the scientific approaches to the definition of responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations. The author, with the help of the deductive method, outlines the scientific theories that interpret the responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations. The author of the article substantiates the theory of responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations, namely: security, punitive, management, coercion, obligation, conviction.
The author considers the features that are inherent for administrative responsibility within banking operations. The author names specific features that are inherent for administrative responsibility within banking operations, namely: small public harm is based on normative, factual and procedural grounds, has negative consequences for delinquency, is accompanied by public condemnation of delicts, does not involve cryptography.
It has been concluded that administrative responsibility for delicts within banking operations is the application of enforcement action for a delinquent offender (an individual or a legal entity) for the violation of banking legislation by the National Bank of Ukraine that are stipulated by the relevant administrative and legal norm. Responsibility for administrative delicts within banking operations is an element of state management mechanism, challenged to restore violated legal relations within banking operations that is protected by the relevant administrative and legal norm by imposing administrative fines for a delinquent offender.
Baryshnikov A.H., 2009. Administrative fine: a conceptual approach to updating the content (as an example of banking activity) [Administratyvnyi shtraf: kontseptualnyi pidkhid do onovlennia zmistu (na prykladi bankivskoi diialnosti)]. Časopis Kiïvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava, No. 3, pp. 114-118. Available at http://www.kul.kiev.ua/images/chasop/2009_3/CHAS09_114.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2018].
Vlasova T.M., 2006. Foundations of enforcement of National Bank of Ukraine [Pidstavy zastosuvannia zakhodiv vplyvu NBU]. Problemì i perspektivi rozvitku bankìvsʹkoï sistemi Ukraïni, Vol. 16, pp. 159-165. Available at https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/58421/5/Vlasova_legal_fact1.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2018].
Komziuk A.T. (ed.), 2000. Administrative liability in Ukraine [Administratyvna vidpovidalnist v Ukraini]. 2nd ed., pererob. i dopov. Kharkiv: Universytet vnutrishnikh sprav.
Bandurka O.M. (ed.), 2011. Administrative law of Ukraine. General part. Academic course [Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Zahalna chastyna. Akademichnyi kurs]. Kharkiv: Zolota mylia.
Kolpakov V.K., 2004. Administrative and tort law phenomenon [Adninistratyvno-deliktnyi pravovyi fenomen]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Lukianets D.M., 2006. Administrative and tort relations in Ukraine: the theory and practice of legal regulation [Administratyvno-deliktni vidnosyny v Ukraini: teoriia i praktyka pravovoho rehuliuvannia]. Sumy: Universytetska knyha.
Kolomoets T.O. (ed.), 2011. Administrative liability [Administratyvna vidpovidalnist]. Kyiv: Istyna.
Nadobko S.V., 2016. Administrative responsibility for violating the law on banks and banking activities. Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University. Available at http://ekhnuir.univer.kharkov.ua/bitstream/123456789/11855/2/aref-Nadobko.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2018].
Copyright (c) 2018 M. Yu. Bukreev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.