Forensic economic examination in the investigation of corruption crimes

Keywords: corruption, corruption crimes, special economic knowledge, forensic economic examination, forensic accounting examination.

Abstract

In the investigation of corruption offenses, the most effective procedural form of using special knowledge is a forensic economic examination. However, the procedure for conducting forensic economic expertise in Ukraine is not without drawbacks, and when carried out within the framework of the investigation of specific corruption crimes is characterized by certain features. The purpose of the article is to generalize and systematize key features, as well as to identify weaknesses in the process of forensic economic examination in the investigation of corruption crimes in Ukraine.

In order to achieve the goal, the legislative interpretation of the concept of “corruption crime” has been investigated. On the basis of statistical information, indicators have been calculated and the dynamics and structure of recorded corruption criminal offenses in Ukraine in 2018–2022 have been analyzed. On the basis of analysis, systematization and generalization of normative and scientific sources the essence, process of emergence and development of the concept of forensic economic expertise has been investigated. The role and importance of forensic economic expertise in the investigation of corruption crimes has been substantiated. The list of basic documents, thorough examination of which by a forensic expert is the basis for detecting corruption, has been systematized. The features of forensic economic examination in the investigation of specific corruption offenses defined by the current legislation of Ukraine have been investigated. The procedure for appointing and conducting forensic economic expertise in Ukraine has been analyzed and its shortcomings and weaknesses have been identified.

Prospects for further research in this area are the study of foreign experience in conducting forensic economic examination in the investigation of corruption crimes, the development of practical recommendations for eliminating the identified shortcomings and improving the procedure for appointing and conducting forensic economic examinations in Ukraine. Purposeful, though gradual, movement in the direction of solving the problem of corruption in Ukraine is a guarantee of strengthening all spheres of public life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

L. A. Parfentii, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Sumy Branch

Candidate of Economic Sciences.
Department of Socio-Economic Disciplines.

References

Dikan, L. V., Ponikarov, V. D., & Kozhushko, O. V. (2017). Forensic economic examination. Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics.

Dyvnych, A. V., & Dyvnych, O. D. (2021, April 15-16). Electronic documents: modern research opportunities and prospects for use during forensic economic examination [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current issues of forensics and forensics”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Honcharenko, V. H., Hor, I. V. (Eds). (2015). Examinations in the judiciary of Ukraine. Yurinkom Inter.

Khavroniuk, M. I. (Ed.). (2019). Corruption schemes: their criminal-legal qualification and pre-trial investigation. Moskalenko O. M.

Klymenko, N. I. (2012). Regarding the essence of corruption and anti-corruption forensic examinations. Viche, 6, 15-17.

Korzh, V. P. (2021). Criminalistic characteristics of corruption crimes: theoretical and practical aspects. Criminalistics and Forensics, 66, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2021.66.22.

Parfentii, L. A. (2022). The role of forensic economic examination in the investigation of corruption crimes [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Training of law enforcement officers in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine under martial law”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Piasetska-Ustych, S. V. (2016). Corruption and the shadow economy in the system of socio-economic relations. Global and National Problems of Economics, 10, 34-39.

Pilyukov, Yu. O., & Shramko, O. M. (2018). Judicial expertise as a form of use of special knowledge under investigation of corruption crimes. Actual Problems of Law, 4, 139-143.

Ponikarov, V. D. (2005). Forensic economic examination. Inzhek.

Proskura, K. P. (2021). Processing corruption risks in institutions by searching information on officials using open sources of information. Criminalistics and Forensics, 66, 837-845.

Shramko, O. M. (2021). Use of special knowledge in the investigation of corruption offenses [Candidate dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].

Tsyvinskyi, O., & Dufeniuk, O. (2021). Problematic issues of forensic economic examination in criminal proceedings. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 2, 291-295.

Vikhliaiev, O. K., & Hermaniuk, I. V. (2021, April 15-16). Problems and prospects of digital document circulation in economic expertise [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current issues of forensics and forensics”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Yusupov, V. V. (2018). Forensics in Ukraine in the ХХ–ХХІ centuries. FOP Maslakov.

Published
2022-12-21
How to Cite
Parfentii, L. A. (2022) “Forensic economic examination in the investigation of corruption crimes”, Law and Safety, 87(4), pp. 13-23. doi: 10.32631/pb.2022.4.01.