Understanding of Punishment in the Philosophical, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient China

Keywords: Ancient China, punishment, institution of punishment, understanding of punishment, principles of applying the punishment, philosophical doctrines

Abstract

Based on the analysis of the philosophical, political and legal doctrines of Ancient China – Taoism, Confucianism, Mo-tze’s guidelines, Mo-dze’s teachings, Legist and Orthodox Confucianism – the authors have demonstrated specific features of understanding the essence of punishment in the ancient Chinese society. The factors that influenced the establishment and development of the institution of punishment in China have been revealed. It has been noted that the specificity of the criminal legislation of the Ancient China was the fact that the reality of the threat to the current government was foremost taken into account while determining the punishment. The most dangerous were considered acts that threatened the ruler, less dangerous that threatened society. Therefore, all punishments can be divided into those that threatened the authority of government, and those that did not directly affect the interests of the ruler. The basic principles of implementing punishments have been defined.

The authors have concluded that the philosophical teachings of Ancient China had significant differences from many political issues, but were similar in understanding the role and purpose of punishment. For the most part, the use of punishment was united into a single system with rewards, which had one purpose: to centralize and strengthen the ruler’s power, to liquidate his political opponents, and to curb the disobedience of the people in all its manifestations. Consequently, punishment was considered as one of the methods of managing a society. It has been noted that there was no understanding about the law in the ancient world. Punishment did not become a separate institution. There was a gradual formation of the institution of punishment. Religion and the morale of those times greatly influenced on that process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ye. S. Lohvynenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Department of constitutional and international law;
teacher.

I. A. Lohvynenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Department of theory and history of state and law;
Candidate of Historical Sciences (Ph.D.), Docent.

References

Bichurin N.Ya., 2002. Statistical Description of the Chinese Empire [Statisticheskoe opisanie Kitaiskoi imperii]. Moscow: Vostochnyi dom.

Bichurin N.Ya., 1842. Statistical Description of the Chinese Dmpire [Statisticheskoe opisanie Kitaiskoi imperii]: in 2 parts. St. Petersburg: Edward Pratz.

Vasiliev K.V., 1974. Central Government and Local Government in the Heyday of the Western Zhou. History and Culture of China [Tsentral`naya vlast` i organy mestnogo upravleniya v gody rastsveta Zapadnogo Chzhou. Istoriya i kul`tura Kitaya]. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 121-128.

Vasilyev L.S., 1977. The Emergence and Formation of the Chinese State [Vozniknovenie i formirovanie kitayskogo gosudarstva]. In: China: History, Culture, Historiography [Kitai: istoriya, ku`ltura, istoriografiya]. Moscow: Nauka. P. 6-39.

Lapova R.A., 1960. The History of the State and Law of China (Slave Period) [Istoriya gosudarstva i prava Kitaya (rabovladel`cheski period)]. Saratov: Izdatel`snvo Saratovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta.

Rogozhin A.I., Strakhov N.N., 1960. The History of the State and the Rghts of Slave-owning China [Istoriya gosudarstva i prava rabovladel`cheskogo Kitaya]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel`stvo yuridicheskoi literatury.

Eliseeff V., Eliseeff D., 2007. Civilization of Classical China [Tsivilizatsiya klassicheskogo Kitaya]. Yekaterinburg: U-Factoriya (Transl. from fr.: L. Loevsky).

Perelomov L.S., 1962. The Qin Empire Is the First Centralized State in China [Imperiya Tsin` – pervoe tsentralizovannoe gosudarstvo v Kitae]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.

Kuchera S.R., 1972. The Formation of the Tradition of Collective Responsibility and Punishment in China [Stanovlenie traditsii kollektivnoi otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya v Kitae]. In: The Role of Traditions in the History and Culture of China [Rol` traditsiy v istorii i kul`ture Kitaya]. Moscow: GRVL Nauka. Pp. 161-183.

Kuchera S.R., 2012. History, Culture and Law of Ancient China [Istoriya, kul`tura i pravo drevnego Kitaya]. Moscow: Natalis.

Kuchera S.R., 1973. Symbolic Punishments in Ancient China [Simvolicheskie nakazaniya v drevnem Kitae]. In: China: Society and State [Kitay: obschestvo i gosudarstvo]. Moscow. Pp. 30-54.

Tyshchenko R.V., 2017. Institute for the Punishment in the Political and Legal Thought of Ancient China [Instytut pokarannia v polityko-pravovii dumtsi Starodavnoho Kytaiu]. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, [online] No. 2, pp. 13-16. Available at http://lsej.org.ua/2_2017/4.pdf [Accessed 26 December 2018].

Lohvynenko Ye.S., 2017. Understanding of Punishment in the Philosophical Learnings of Ancient China [Rozuminnia pokarannia u filosofskykh vchenniakh Starodavnoho Kytaiu]. In: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs et al. Law-enforcement Function of the State: Theoretical and Methodological, Historical and Legal Problems [Pravookhoronna funktsiia derzhavy: teoretyko-metodolohichni ta istoryko-pravovi problemy]. Kharkiv, 27 October. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav.

Torchinov E.A., 2004. Taoism. “Tao Te Ching” [Daosizm. “Dao-De tszin”]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika; Petersburgckoe Vostokovedenie.

Tao Te Ching, 2002. Moscow: AST; Astrel` (Transl.: Malyavin V.V.).

Strelets Yu.S., 2009. The Meaning of Human Life: From History to Eternity [Smyisl zhizni cheloveka: ot istorii k vechnosti]. Available at http://www.orenport.ru/images/doc/924/Strelez.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2018].

Confucius, 2000. Sayings [Izrecheniya]. Kharkiv: Folio; Moscow: AST.

Confucian Treatise “Zhong Yun”, 2003. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. (Compositor: Luk`yanov A.E.; ed.: Titarenko M.L.).

Confucius, 2001. Lun Yu [Lun` Yui]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.

Mo Tzu, 1972. Ancient Chinese Philosophy [Drevnekitaiskaya filosofiya]: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl`. Pp. 175-200.

Guan Zhong, 1973. Guan Tzu. Ancient Chinese Philosophy [Guan`-tszy. Drevnekitaiskaya filosofiya]: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl`. Pp. 14-57.

Barikhin A.B., 2010. Big Legal Encyclopedia [Bol`shaya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya]. Moscow: Knizhnyi mir.

The Book of the Ruler of the Shang Region (Shang Jun Shu) [Kniga pravitelya oblasti Shan (Shan tszyun` shu)], 1993. 2nd ed. Moscow: Ladomir. (Transl., comments: Perelomov L.S.).

Tsar`kov I.I., 2011. Two Views on the System of “Awards and Punishments” (From the History of Political and Legal Studies) [Dva vzglyada na sistemu “Nagrad i nakazanii” (iz istorii politicheskikh i pravovykh uchenii)]. Vestnik Volžskogo universiteta imeni V.N.Tatiŝeva. Seriâ Ûrisprudenciâ – Bulletin of Volzhsky University after V.N.Tatishchev. Series “Jurisprudence”, No. 75, pp. 128-146.

Chan Yang, 1990. Ancient Chinese Philosophy. Han Era [Drevnekitaiskaya filosofiya. Epokha Khan`]. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 354-365.

Montesquieu Sh.L., 1999. About the Spirit of Laws [O dukhe zakonov]. Moscow: Mysl`.


Abstract views: 35
PDF Downloads: 32
Published
2019-03-26
How to Cite
Lohvynenko, Y. and Lohvynenko, I. (2019) “Understanding of Punishment in the Philosophical, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient China”, Law and Safety, 72(1), pp. 65-71. doi: 10.32631/pb.2019.1.08.

Section
CRIME COUNTERACTION AND COMBATING CORRUPTION