Urgent restraining and restrictive orders as special response forms for domestic violence: international experience and national practice

Keywords: domestic violence, urgent restraining order, restraining order, lawmaking, international experience

Abstract

The authors of the article have substantiated the importance of the prevention of domestic violence and proper response to such cases in accordance with European and world standards. The authors have analyzed international experience of introducing restrictive measures for the persons who have committed domestic violence and the differences between urgent restraining and restrictive orders provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention and Combating Domestic Violence” in order to create conditions for their effective application in practice.

The authors have also analyzed the content of the restrictive order regarding the abuser as established by the court procedure as a mean of temporal restriction of the rights or the assignment of duties to a person who committed domestic violence aimed at ensuring the safety of the victim. The authors have characterized the urgent restraining order as a special measure to counteract domestic violence, which is used by the authorized units of the National Police of Ukraine as a response to the fact of domestic violence and aimed at its immediate termination, elimination of the danger to the lives and health of victims and preventing the continuation or re-execution of such violence. The procedures of application of the above mentioned orders have been provided.

The comparative and legal analysis of the restrictive and urgent restraining orders has been carried out.

International experience of applying a protective order in combating domestic violence has been generalized; reference to the relevant regulatory acts has been provided.

It has been noted that the current stage of normative and legal, organizational and law-enforcement provision for combating domestic violence in Ukraine is characterized by both significant progress and serious problems that impede the mentioned progress. These problems are largely in the field of lawmaking and require more attention to the adoption of relevant regulatory acts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

K. B. Levchenko, Government Commissioner for Gender Policy

Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor.

M. M. Lehenka, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Postgraduate student.

References

Horbova H.O., 2016. Administrative and legal regulation of combating domestic violence [Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia protydii nasylstvu v simi]. Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. National Aviation University.

Kolomoiets O.D., 2010. Administrative-legal regulation of responsibility for family violence commitment, protective orders’ non-realization and corrective programs non-passing [Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia vidpovidalnosti za vchynennia nasylstva u simi, nevykonannia zakhysnoho prypysu abo neprokhodzhennia korektsiinoi prohramy]. Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. Classical Private University.

Bandurka O.M., Bondarenko O.F., Bryzhyk V.O. et al., 2011. Monitoring the state of executing legislation of Ukraine in regard to counteracting domestic violence. 2001-2011 [Monitorynh stanu vykonannia zakonodavsnva Ukrainy shchodo protydii nasylstvu v simi]. Kharkiv: Prava liudyny. (Eds: Bandurka O.M., Levchenko K.B.).

The President signed the law on the prevention and combating domestic violence [Hlava derzhavy pidpysav Zakon pro zapobihannia ta protydiiu domashnomu nasylstvu]. [online] President of Ukraine. Available at http://www.president.gov.ua/news/glava-derzhavi-pidpisav-zakon-pro-zapobigannya-ta-protidiyu-45354 [Accessed 4 December 2018].

Zaporozhtsev A.V., Labun A.V., Zabroda D.H., Basysta I.V., Drozdova I.V., Bryzhyk V.O. and Musiienko O.M. (compositors), 2012. Domestic violence and the activities of internal affairs agencies to overcome it [Nasylstvo v simi ta diialnist orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav shchodo yoho podolannia]. Kyiv: Universytet “Ukraina”.

Haiduk Yu.A., 2016. Preventing domestic abuse in national and international law [Poperedzhennia domashnoho nasyllia u natsionalnomu ta mizhnarodnomu zakonodavstvi]. Aktualʹnì problemi vìtčiznânoï ûrisprudencìï – Actual problems of native jurisprudence, Iss. 3, p. 152.

Kharlamov V.S., 2014. The institute of protection order in the international legislation as a tool for protection of a person from domestic violence [Institut okhrannogo ordera v zarubezhnom zakonodatel`stve kak instrument zashchity lichnosti ot vnutrisemeinogo nasiliya]. Kriminologiâ: včera, segodnâ, zavtra – Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow, [online] Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 34-40. Available at https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/institut-ohrannogo-ordera-v-zarubezhnom-zakonodatelstve-kak-instrument-zaschity-lichnosti-ot-vnutrisemeynogo-nasiliya [Accessed 4 December 2018].

Fisher H. (prep.), 2014. Convention of a Council of Europe on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul convention) [Konventsiia Rady Yevropy pro zapobihannia nasylstvu stosovno zhinok i domashnomu nasylstvu ta borotbu iz tsymy yavyshchamy]. [online] Council of Europe. Kyiv: K.I.S. Available at https://rm.coe.int/1680096e45 [Accessed 4 December 2018].


Abstract views: 102
PDF Downloads: 86
Published
2018-12-27
How to Cite
Levchenko, K. and Lehenka, M. (2018) “Urgent restraining and restrictive orders as special response forms for domestic violence: international experience and national practice”, Law and Safety, 71(4), pp. 60-65. doi: 10.32631/pb.2018.4.08.

Section
THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY