Characteristics of Offender’s Personality who Committs False Suggestion of the Court or Other Authorized Agency
Particular attention has been paid on the necessity and urgency of developing a methodology for investigating the false suggestion of the court or other authorized agency, where a compulsory element of the criminalistic characteristic is the offender’s personality.
It has been offered to divide the basic data about a person who commits false suggestion of the court or other authorized agency into the following groups: 1) biological: age, sex, anatomical and physiological qualities; 2) social: education, employment, marital status, criminal experience, communication with the person who committed the casual crime, motive.
It has been noted that a large part of the studied crimes are committed with the purpose of concealing the crimes already committed, including with the aim of rebutment of the criminal’s guilt, that is, the majority of these crimes are derivative (casual) crimes from the main crime, where a certain subject is false suggested.
It has been noted that most of the persons who commit the false suggestion of the court or other authorized agency have social relations with the person who committed the casual crime.
Studying the materials of investigative and court practice indicates that family relationships are typical for these crimes. Besides, relations to such criminal offenses are characterized by the existence of friendly or conversely hostile relationships.
The author has noted the existence of correlated relations between the person who commits the false suggestion of the court or other authorized agency with the motives for committing the crime.
It has been established that researched crimes are most often committed for the following motives: 1) pity or desire to cover up the offender with whom the person has friendly or family relationship; 2) revenge, negative relationships, the desire to aggravate the situation of the offender; 3) benefits; 4) shame.
Bakhin V.P., 2002. Forensics. Problems and opinions (1962-2002) [Kriminalistika. Problemy i mneniya (1962-2002 gg.)]. Kyiv.
Belkin R.S., 1997. Forensics course. Private forensic theories [Kurs kriminalistiki. Chastnye kriminalisticheskie teorii]: in 3 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Yurist`.
Bernaz V.D., Biriukov V.V., Volobuiev A.F. et al., 2011. Forensics [Kryminalistyka]. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. (Ed.: Volobuiev A.F.).
Shepitko V.Yu., Konovalova V.O., Zhuravel V.A. et al., 2008. Forensics [Kryminalistyka]. 4th ed. Kharkiv: Pravo. (Ed.: Shepitko V.Yu.).
Melnyk M.I. and Khavroniuk M.I. (eds), 2009. Scientific and practical commentary of the Criminal Code of Ukraine [Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy]. 6th ed. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka.
Bazhanov M.I., Stashys V.V., Tatsii V.Ya. (eds), 2008. Criminal law of Ukraine. The common part [Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Zahalna chastyna]. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Ivanov Yu.F. and Dzhuzha O.M., 2006. Criminology [Kryminolohiia]. Kyiv: Palyvoda A.V.
Konovalova V.O. and Shepitko V.Yu., 2008. Legal psychology [Yurydychna psykholohiia]. 2nd ed. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Obraztsov V.A., 1994. Forensics [Kriminalistika]. Moscow: Yurikon.
Danshyn I.M., Holina V.V., Valuiska M.Yu. et al., 2009. Criminology. General and special parts [Kryminolohiia. Zahalna ta osoblyva chastyny]. 2nd ed. Kharkiv: Pravо. (Ed.: Holina V.V.).
Zhbankov V.A., 1995. The constitutional basis for establishing an offender's personality in forensic science [Kontseptual`nye osnovy ustanovleniya lichnosti prestupnika v kriminalistike]. Abstract of D.Sc. dissertation. Moscow.
Tsvetkov P.P., 1973. Investigation of the personality of the accused [Issledovanie lichnosti obvinyaemogo]. Leningrad: Izdatel`stvo LGU.
Tishchenko V.V., 2007. Theoretical and practical foundations of the method of investigation of crimes [Teoretychni i praktychni osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv]. Odesa: Feniks.
Chetvertak D.Yu., 2016. The method of investigating the concealment of crimes [Metodyka rozsliduvannia prykhovuvannia zlochyniv]. Ph.D. dissertation. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
Kotlubaieva K.S., 2018. The reasons for misleading the court or other authorized body as an element of their forensic characteristics [Motyvy vvedennia v omanu sudu abo inshoho upovnovazhenoho orhanu yak element yikh kryminalistychnoi kharakterystyky]. In: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs et al., Topical problems of modern science in the research of young scientists [Aktualni problemy suchasnoi nauky v doslidzhenniakh molodykh uchenykh]. Kharkiv, 17 May. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav.
Picha V.M., 1999. Sociology: general course [Sotsiolohiia: zahalnyi kurs]. Kyiv: Karavela.
Copyright (c) 2019 K. S. Kotlubaeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.