Theoretical background to the forensic characteristics formation for hostage-taking of a government official or law enforcement officer.
Abstract
The widespread aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine has led to an increase in the number of people in vulnerable situations, including a significant increase in the cases of disappearances and hostage-taking. In this regard, there is a need to improve the methods of investigating the hostage-taking of government officials or law enforcement officers. When developing and formulating an appropriate investigation methodology, it is first of all necessary to determine the forensic characteristics of the relevant crime.
The purpose of the article is to define the concept, purpose, sources of formation and elements of the forensic characteristic of hostage-taking of a government official or a law enforcement officer. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: analysis to work with the existing views of scholars on the issues of forensic characteristics; comparison to summarise information on the seizure of people both in the world and in Ukraine; and the scientific functional method to determine the purpose of forensic characteristics.
As a result of the study, it has been established that there are some developments in the formation of various methods for investigating criminal offences, but there is no methodology for investigating the hostage-taking of a government official or a law enforcement officer. Therefore, there is a need, first of all, to formulate a forensic characteristic of the crimes under investigation, which will serve as the first step in the development of the investigation methodology.
The concept of “forensic characteristics of hostage-taking of a government official or a law enforcement officer” has been defined as an important component of the forensic methodology, which is a detailed description of a criminal offence which will serve as a basis for solving practical problems arising during the pre-trial investigation. It has been clarified the theoretical and practical role of forensic characteristics, and two types of sources of information necessary for its formation have been identified: persons who have information about a criminal offence, including law enforcement officers, experts and specialists, and other participants to criminal proceedings; as well as relevant documents. Scientific positions on determining the composition of a forensic characteristic have been analysed and typical elements of the forensic characteristic of a hostage taking of a government official or a law enforcement officer have been identified: the circumstances of the crime, the method of its commission, traces of the crime, tools and means, the identity of the victim and the identity of the perpetrator.
Downloads
References
Akimov, M. O. (2009). Criminal and legal characteristics of hostage-taking under the legislation of Ukraine [Candidate thesis, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Andrushko, A. V. (2017). Criminological Characteristics of Hostage-Taking. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 4, 213-218.
Antoshchuk, A. O. (2012). Forensic characteristics of the mother’s murder of her newborn child. Customs Business, 2(2), 430-433.
Baumann, C. E. (1973). The diplomatic kidnappings: A revolutionary tactic of urban terrorism. Martinus Nijhoff.
Borysenko, I. V. (2006). The identity of the victim as an element of the forensic characteristics of murders with dismemberment of the corpse. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 35, 142-149.
Chaplynska, Yu. A. (2019). The issue of essence and structure of forensic description of crimes. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 194-198. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2019-3-194-198.
Dolnik, A., & Fitzgerald, K. (2007). Negotiating hostage crises with the new terrorists. Gary Noesner. https://garynoesner.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Foreword-for-DolnikFitzgerald.pdf.
Dyrud, P. J. (2021). Think Twice: Deterring Transnational Kidnapping Through Rescue [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences].
Forest, J. J. F. (2012). Kidnapping by Terrorist Groups, 1970–2010: Is Ideological Orientation Relevant? Crime & Delinquency, 58(5), 769-797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712452962.
Gleis, J. (2007). Israel’s struggle against Palestinian terror organizations. In J. Forest (Ed.), Countering terrorism and insurgency in the 21st century (pp. 408-429). Praeger Security International.
Gusieva, V. O. (2017). Criminal Characteristics of the Attempt on the Law Enforcement Officer’s Life. Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. O. Didorenko, 3, 211-216.
Husieva, V. O. (2021). Theoretical foundations of the methodology of investigating crimes against the authority of state authorities in the field of law enforcement [Doctoral dissertation, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs].
Kohutych, I. I. (2008). Criminalistics. Atika.
Kolesnichenko, A. N. (1965). Forensic characteristics of crimes. Kharkov.
Kolesnichenko, A. N. (1988). Forensic characteristics of crimes. Chapter II. Soviet criminalistics. Methodology for investigating certain types of crimes (V. K. Lysychenko, ed.). High school.
Kyrbiatiev, O. O. (2021). Criminal law protection of the professional activity of law enforcement officers [Doctoral dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Maliarova, V. O. (2013). Investigation of crimes against morality in the field of sexual relations: theory and practice (S. M. Husarov, ed.). Dysa plus.
Maliarova, V. O. (2015). Forensic methodology: business relationship with other criminological characteristics. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 35(1), 111-113.
Olishevskyi, V. V. (2005). Investigation and prevention of kidnapping committed for selfish reasons [Candidate thesis, National University of Internal Affairs].
Orzhynska, E. (2021). Criminalistics characteristics of crime: consept and practical signification. Jurnalul Juridic National: Teorie şi Practică, 1(46), 99-102.
Saltevskyi, M. V. (2005). Forensic science (modern version). Kondor.
Shepitko, M. V. (2018). Problems of the formation of methodological and forensic tools in the structure of combating crimes in the sphere of justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 18, 73-80.
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2003). Criminalistics. Odysseus.
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2005). Criminalistics. Odysseus.
Starchenko, O. V., & Bubela, M. I. (2010). The essence and significance of forensic characteristics and its elements in the detection and investigation of crimes. Forum of Law, 4, 853-858. http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/FP_index.htm_2010_4_137.pdf.
Stepaniuk, R. L. (2013). Problems of forming the forensic characteristics of certain types and groups of crimes. Bulletin of Criminological Association of Ukraine, 5, 173-180.
Stepaniuk, R. L. (2014). The essence and practical significance of forensic characterization of crimes. Comparative and Analytical Law, 5, 386-388.
Voitovych, Ye. M. (2021). Methods of investigating the enforced disappearance of a person [Candidate dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Voitovych, Ye. M., Tychyna, D. M., & Antoshchuk, A. O. (2022). Basics of the methodology of the investigation of the enforced disappearance of a person. 7BTs.
Vyhivskyi, I. M. (2021). Investigating the hostage taking [Candidate dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Copyright (c) 2023 V. O. Husieva, O. Yu. Prokopenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
