Отмена меры пресечения в виде содержания под стражей в условиях военного состояния в контексте ст. 616 УПК Украины
Аннотация
В научной статье отражены актуальные изменения, внесенные в УПК Украины вследствие введения военного положения. Исследованы особенности отмены и изменения меры пресечения в виде содержания под стражей в условиях военного положения. Выяснена проблематика реализации этой нормы, в частности это отсутствие темпорального определения, требование законодателя по поводу освещения в ходатайстве пунктов, касающихся анализа рисков. Отражены особенности реализации ст. 616 УПК Украины в аспекте отмены меры пресечения в виде содержания под стражей в условиях военного положения. Обращено внимание на метаморфозы указанных процедур с учетом введения военного положения и сформулированы предложения по устранению недостатков на правотворческом и правоприменительном уровнях.
Скачивания
Литература
Drozd, V. H., & Klimchuk, V. P. (2016). Grounds and procedure for applying non-isolation preventive measures. Science and Law Enforcement, 1, 251-257.
Fomina, T. (2018). The essence of the procedural procedure for the application of a preventive measure. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 2, 207-211.
Fomina, T., & Rohalska, V. (2022). Special mode of investigation. Precautions under martial law: what has changed. Law and Business. https://zib.com.ua/ua/151472-zapobizhni_zahodi_v_umovah_voennogo_stanu_scho_zminilos.html.
Hloviuk, I. V (2017). General rules for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings: issues of systematicity. Bulletin of the Southern Regional Center of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 12, 87-92.
Hloviuk, I. V., & Zavtur, V. A. (2022, March 3). Amendments to criminal proceedings under martial law: amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine from March 3, 2022 and clarification by the Supreme Court. NAAU Higher School of Advocacy. https://www.hsa.org.ua/blog/novely-zdijsnennya-kryminalnogo-provadzhennya-v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu-zminy-do-kpk-ukrayiny-vid-03-bereznya-2022-ta-roz-yasnennya-verhovnogo-sudu/.
Hloviuk, I., Drozdov, O., Teteriatnyk, H., Fomina, T., Rohalska, V., & Zavtur, V. (2022). Special regime of pre-trial investigation, trial under martial law: scientific and practical commentary on Section IX-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Issue 2. As of May 3, 2022. Dnipro; Lviv; Odesa; Kharkiv.
Hloviuk, I., Drozdov, O., Teteriatnyk, H., Fomina, T., Rohalska, V., & Zavtur, V. (2022). Special regime of pre-trial investigation, trial under martial law: scientific and practical commentary on Section IX-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Issue 3. As of August 25, 2022. Dnipro; Lviv; Odesa; Kharkiv.
Khablo, O. Yu. (2020). Substantiation of grounds for application of preventive measures: convention standards and national practice. Law and Society, 4, 270-278. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.4.39
Merimerina, I. O. (2021). The prosecutor as a subject of proof in the selection, change, cancellation of measures to ensure criminal proceedings by the investigating judge, the court [Candidate dissertation, National University “Odesa Law Academy”].
Teteriatnyk, K. H. (2021). Criminal proceedings under emergency legal regimes: theoretical, methodological and praxeological foundations. Helvetica.
Tyshchenko, O. I. (2019). Chang of a preventive measure in criminal proceedings: some issues. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 5, 325-328. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2019-5/78.
Yeni, O. V. (2016). Activities of the prosecutor in the preparation of motions for the application of precautionary measures. Bulletin of the Prosecutor’s Office, 5, 50-59.
Zavertailo, I. O. (2015). Problematic aspects of the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine in practice in the election of a preventive measure as detention, make a determination on the resolution on detention for the purpose of delivery. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 34(3), 79-83.
Zavertailo, I. O. (2015). Procedural violations during the drafting of the indictment and grounds for its return by the court to eliminate deficiencies, including with the agreement (view of a practical worker). Bulletin of the Academy of Customs Affairs. Series: Law, 1(14), 127-133.
Zavertailo, I. O. (2018). The role of the prosecutor in proving the circumstances during the detention of the suspect and the selection of preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation. In Yu. P. Alenin (Ed.), Criminal Procedure Code of 2012: Ideology and law enforcement practice (pp. 551-573). Helvetica.
Copyright (c) 2022 А. Г. Гаркуша
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
