Agreement on the Results of Mediation in the System of Administrative and Legal Regulation
Abstract
Peculiarities of contractual relations on mediation within the system of administrative and legal regulation have been studied. The imperfection of the justice system necessitates the use of innovative alternative methods of resolving disputes, one of which is mediation. The main indicator of the success of the institution of mediation in the state is the level of implementation of agreements based on the results of the mediation procedure.
The purpose of the article is theoretical and legal analysis of specific features of the agreement based on the results of the mediation procedure in the public and legal sphere.
The methodological basis of the scientific article is a set of general scientific and special research methods. In particular, the conditions of identification of the agreement by the results of mediation with the settlement agreement and their connection with the administrative agreement have been determined by the means of the comparative and legal method.
The author has accomplished the analysis of the concept of a mediation agreement and has determined that it is an agreement on arrangements reached by the parties in the process of dispute settlement through mediation. It has been established that the identification of the agreement by the results of mediation in public and legal disputes and amicable arrangement within administrative procedure is possible only with the functioning of the judicial model of mediation, where the mediator is a judge who approves the parties’ agreement.
It has been concluded that the understanding of a mediation agreement as an administrative agreement is considered difficult in regard to the ambiguity of the institution of an administrative agreement in Ukraine. The mechanism of notarization of mediation agreements has been recognized as the most effective for Ukraine by introducing a mechanism for execution of agreements based on the results of mediation in the system of administrative and legal regulation, given the limited powers of the authorities involved in mediation. The author has emphasized on the need to adopt a special law on mediation, which sets out the general requirements for the agreement based on the results of mediation, its terms and provides guarantees for the implementation of the agreements of the parties.
Downloads
References
Burova L.I., 2015. Legal nature of the mediation agreement [Pravova pryroda mediatsiinoi uhody]. Časopis civìlìstiki, Iss. 18, pp. 56-59.
Shynkar T.I., 2016. Judicial and extrajudicial mediation procedures [Sudova ta pozasudova protsedury mediatsii]. In: Afanasiev M.V. (ed.) Mediation agreement as a result of a successful mediation procedure. Legal and institutional mechanisms for securing the development of the state of law in the minds of European Integration [Mediatsiina uhoda yak rezultat uspishno provedenoi protsedury mediatsii. Pravovi ta instytutsiini mekhanizmy zabezpechennia rozvytku derzhavy ta prava v umovakh yevrointehratsii]. Odesa, 20 May. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. Pp. 16-18.
Mazaraki N., 2018. General characteristics of agreements concluded in the field of mediation [Zahalna kharakterystyka dohovoriv, shcho ukladaiutsia u sferi mediatsii]. Pìdpriêmnictvo, gospodarstvo ì pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, No. 2, pp. 171-174.
Sydielnikov O.D., 2017. Institute of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings [Instytut prymyrennia storin v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi]. Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.
Kamenkov V.S., 2015. Mediation agreement: legal nature and meaning [Mediativnoe soglashenie: pravovaya priroda i znachenie]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, No. 8, pp. 59-66.
Kucherova M., 2019. Mediation and amicable settlement in the settlement of land disputes [Mediatsiina ta myrova uhoda pry vrehuliuvanni zemelnykh sporiv]. Pìdpriêmnictvo, gospodarstvo ì pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, No. 9, pp. 83-87.
Bila V.R., 2019. Administrative contract as a legal form of public administration: updating doctrinal approaches [Administratyvnyi dohovir yak pravova forma publichnoho administruvannia: onovlennia doktrynalnykh pidkhodiv]. Pravo Bezpeka, No. 4, pp. 43-48.
Bortnikova A.H., 2017. Mediation agreement concluded as a result of resolving a public law dispute in the framework of out-of-court mediation [Mediatsiina uhoda, ukladena za rezultatamy vyrishennia publichno-pravovoho sporu v ramkakh pozasudovoi mediatsii]. Aktualʹnì problemi vìtčiznânoï ûrisprudencìï – Actual Problems of Native Jurisprudence, No. 6, pp. 77-80.
Khokhlenko O.M., 2019. Procedure for concluding administrative agreements [Protsedura ukladennia administratyvnykh dohovoriv]. Dictum factum, No. 1, pp. 79-86.
Stepanova I.A., 2018. Agreements concluded within the framework of the mediation procedure: issues of efficiency [Soglasheniia, zakliuchaemye v ramkakh protsedury mediatsii: voprosy effektivnosti]. Legal Concept, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 117-124.
Eliseeva T.S., 2015. Problems of execution of a mediation agreement and legal mechanisms for their solution [Problemy ispolneniya mediativnogo soglasheniya i pravovye mekhanizmy ikh resheniya]. Čelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, No. 3, pp. 130-134.
Copyright (c) 2020 K. S. Tokarieva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
