Adaptation of the five-factor BFI-10 personality screening questionnaire and testing of its diagnostic properties on the example of drug users

О. О.  Serdiuk; В. О. Bazyma

doi:10.32631/pb.2021.4.10

О. О. Serdiuk Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5733-6432
В. О. Bazyma Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-1920

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2021.4.10

Keywords: screening, personality, big five, adaptation, construct validity, reliability, BFI-10.

Abstract

Extended annotation. The large number of questions from the most common and cited in the scientific literature questionnaires of the "Big Five" makes them unsuitable for surveys of large samples of poorly motivated respondents. It is described the process of adaptation, validation and diagnostic properties of the five-factor BFI-10 Express Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire, which contains only 10 questions and has shown high reliability in large comparative cross-cultural studies using a web methodology. Validation was performed by filling in parallel forms of the 5PFQ questionnaire for 75 questions (validated version of A.B. Khromov, N = 2492), LBP questionnaire for 25 questions (validated version of L.F. Burlachuk and D.K. Korolev, N = 246) and questionnaire BFI-10. The validation of the BFI-10 has showed that our adapted version of the questionnaire measured the same constructs as the 5PFQ and BFL questionnaires. There is a positive correlation between the total values of the scales of all three questionnaires of the "big five", significant at the level of p <0.01. The highest values of the linear correlation coefficient of the BFI-10 scales are observed for factors "N" - neuroticism (BFL r = 0.620, 5PFQ r = 0.466) and "E" - extraversion (BFL r = 0.688, 5PFQ r = 0.441). The internal consistency characteristics of the 5PFQ, BFL, and BFI-10 questionnaire scales show that the Cronbach's alpha is increased when BFI-10 questions are added to the original 5PFQ and BFL scales. For BFL and BFI-10, Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.64 to 0.85. For 5PFQ and BFI-10, Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.76 to 0.88. The BFI-10 adapted variant has showed its diagnostic applicability in a study of drug and non-drug users (N = 4723). The results of the comparison of the average values of the BFI-10 scales (t-test) show that there are statistically significant differences between young people who used and did not use drugs in the 12 months before the survey. The greatest diagnostic significance has been shown by factor "C" - consciousness (t = -8,504; p <0,01). Statistically significant differences have not been detected only by factor "E" (extraversion). Thus, young people who have confessed to drug use can be described as less conscious (responsible), more conflicted (hostile), more neurotic, but also more creative and prone to experimenting and gaining new experiences. The obtained results prove that the proposed adaptation of BFI-10 meets the criteria of diagnostic reliability and validity, and can be recommended for express diagnosis of personality in terms of mass sample surveys and express individual screening of personality traits in the Ukrainian-speaking environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

О. О. Serdiuk, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor.
Research Lab on Crime Enforcement.

В. О. Bazyma, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Psychological Sciences.
Research Lab on Crime Enforcement.

References

Бурлачук Л. Ф., Королев Д. К. Адаптация опросника для диагностики пяти факторов личности. Вопросы психологии. 2000. № 1. С. 126–142.

Виноградов О. Г. «Залежить від ситуації»: якісний аналіз ситуаційних уточнень. Актуальні проблеми соціології, психології, педагогіки. 2015. № 3 (28). C. 14–25.

Егорова М. С., Паршикова О. В. Психометрические характеристики Короткого портретного опросника Большой пятерки (Б5-10). Психологические исследования. 2016. Т. 9, № 45. С. 9.

Кліманська М. Б., Галецька І. І. Українська адаптація короткого п’ятифакторного опитувальника особистості TIPI (TIPI-UKR). Психологічний часопис. 2019. № 5 (9). С. 57–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.9.4.

Князев Г. Г., Митрофанова Л. Г., Бочаров В. А. Валидизация русскоязычной версии опросника Л. Голдберга «Маркеры факторов «Большой пятерки». Психологический журнал. 2010. Т. 31, № 5. С. 100–110.

Молодь та наркотики – 2021 : результати моніторингу залежної поведінки серед молоді м. Харків 1995–2020 років та студентського модуля Українського лонгітюдного дослідження (ULS+) : монографія / О. О. Сердюк, В. В. Бурлака, Г. М. Даниленко та ін. ; МВС України, Харків. нац. ун-т внутр. справ. Харків, 2021. 92 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/dr2021.

Сергеева А. С., Кириллов Б. А., Джумагулова А. Ф. Перевод и адаптация краткого пятифакторного опросника личности (TIPI-RU): оценка конвергентной валидности, внутренней согласованности и тест-ретестовой надежности. Экспериментальная психология. 2016. Т. 9, № 3. С. 138–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2016090311.

Українське Лонгітюдне Дослідження = Ukrainian Longitudinal Study (ULS) : метод. рек. з використання психодіагност. інструментів другої хвилі дослідж. / С. Д. Максименко, О. М. Кокун, В. Г. Панок та ін. ; НАПН України, Ін-т психології ім. Г. С. Костюка, УНМЦ практичної психології та соціальної роботи ; НАМН України, ДУ «Ін-т охорони здоров’я дітей та підлітків», ДУ «Ін-т неврології психіатрії та наркології» ; МВС України, Харків. нац. ун-т. внутр. справ ; Ун-т Вейна. Київ : Ін-т психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України, 2021. 72 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/uls2021.

Хромов А. Б. Пятифакторный опросник личности : учеб.-метод. пособие. Курган : Изд-во Курган. гос. ун-та, 2000. 23 с.

Шмелев А. Г. Психодиагностика личностных черт. СПб. : Речь, 2002. 480 с.

Aronson Z. H., Reilly R. R., Lynn G. S. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2006. No. 23. Pp. 221–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.06.003.

Benet-Martinez V., John O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. No. 75 (3). Pp. 729–750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729.

Bernard L. C., Walsh R. P., Mills M. Ask once, may tell: Comparative validity of single and multiple item measurement of the Big-Five personality factors. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal. 2005. No. 2 (1). Pp. 40–57.

Chiorri C., Bracco F., Piccinno T., Modafferi C., Battini V. Psychometric properties of a revised version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2015. No. 31 (2). Pp. 109–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000215.

Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional manual. Odessa : FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992. 13 p.

Crede M., Harms P., Niehorster S., Gaye-Valentine A. An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. No. 102 (4). Pp. 874–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403.

Donnellan M. B., Oswald F. L., Baird B. M., Lucas R. E. The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment. 2006. No. 18 (2). Pp. 192–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.

Goldberg L. R. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models // Personality psychology in Europe / ed. by I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf. Edinburg : Tilburg University Press, 1999. Pp. 7–28.

Goldberg L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 1992. No. 4 (1). Pp. 26–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., Swann W. B. Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 2003. No. 37 (6). Pp. 504–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.

Herzberg P. Y., Brähler E. Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms. A cautionary note and a proposal. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2006. No. 22. Pp. 139–148.

Hofmans J., Kuppens P., Allik J. Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch language. Personality and Individual Differences. 2008. No. 45 (8). Pp. 750–755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.004.

John O. P., Srivastava S. The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives // Handbook of personality: Theory and research / ed. by L. A. Pervin, O. P. John. New York : Guilford Press, 1999. Pp. 102–138.

Martin T. A., Costa P. T. Jr., Oryol V. E., Rukavishnikov A. A., Senin I. G. Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R // The Five-Factor model of personality across cultures / ed. by R. R. McCrae, J. Allik. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002. Pp. 261–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13.

McCrae R. R., Costa P. T. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and individual differences. 2004. No. 36 (3). Pp. 587–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1.

Rammstedt B., John O. P. Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit. Diagnostica. 2005. No. 51. Pp. 195–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195.

Rammstedt B., John O. P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality. 2007. No. 41 (1). Pp. 203–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.

Tsuji H., Fujishima Y., Tsuji H., Natsuno Y., Mukoyama Y., Yamada N. Five-factor model of personality: Concept, structure, and measurement of personality traits. Japanese Psychological Review. 1997. No. 40 (2). Pp. 239–259.

Woods S. A., Hampson S. E. Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality. 2005. No. 19. Pp. 373–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.542.