Concerning the system of principles of scientific knowledge for the State power digitization
Abstract
On the basis of the latest achievements of theoretical and legal science and other related scientific disciplines, the principles of scientific knowledge for the state power digitalization have been comprehensively studied. The principle of scientific objectivity, applied to the sphere of state power digitalization, acquires some new features, in particular, provides for the consideration of such a variety (form) of digitalization as an objective process that takes place in terms of both promoting and resisting by elements of this process, which takes place in conditions of both assistance and resistance to it by various actors in this process, which makes it difficult to predict the concrete results of the corresponding transformation of state power. This form of digitalization does not occur spontaneously, unlike other forms (in the field of education and economics), but involves its conscious and purposeful management. It has been shown that due to the principle of historicism the processes of state power digitalization in Ukraine are an element of the general civilization process, which occurs in a single trend of world civilization in general and different countries in particular towards the formation of digital civilization. It has been established that determinism is closely related to the previous principles and reveals its role in the study of digitalization of state power in that the very idea of its conditionality by a set of objective and subjective preconditions and reasons makes this process really objective and in demand in the information society. It has been noted that the principle of anthropologism provides an interpretation of digitalization, which is covered by the concept of construct, created and reproduced by the daily actions of legal entities. As a result, digitalization appears as a fragment of human activity to implement certain concepts that involve a conscious and appropriate transformation of state power and it is "the effectiveness of the influence of law on public relations that depends on the subject of law. It has been proved that methodological pluralism in the study of digitalization of state power involves the possibility of effective use of different methods and principles of cognition, combined with the principle of complementarity.
Downloads
References
Chestnov, I. (2001). Postclassical theory of law: the contours of a new paradigm. Law of Ukraine, 8, 109–114.
Dobroboh, L. M. (2015). Genesis and development of law: problems of history and theory. Lira LTD.
Fedorenko, V. L. (2015). Methodology of modern constitutional and legal research in Ukraine. Lira-K.
Khabrieva, T. Ya., & Chernogor, N. N. (2018). The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 1, 85–102.
Khalin, V. G., & Chernova, G. V. (2018). Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Administrative Consulting, 10, 46–63. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-46-63.
Kholopov, A. V. (2020). A person in the conditions of digitalization of law: problems and ways of development. Legal Science, 6, 8–12.
Kopcha, V. V. (2020). Methodology of legal phenomenon research: concept, structure, tools. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 1, 54–58.
Kukhtyk, S. V. (2015). Transformation of state under the influence of globalization (theoretical and legal aspect) [Candidate dissertation, V. M. Koretskyy Institute of State and Law National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Marchenko, M. N. (2002). Theory of state and law. Elementary course. Yurist.
Mikhalchenko, M. I. et al. (2016). Transformation of political institutions of Ukraine: problems of theory and practice. IPiEND named after I. F. Kuras NAS of Ukraine.
Oborotov, Yu. (2004). Traditions and innovations in legal development. Psychology & Society, 1, 15–42.
Popova, S. (2019). On the question of the concept of digital transformation of science. Trends and Management, 4. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0730.2019.4.31941.
Pustovit, N. V. (2015). The nature of the axiosphere of the information society [Candidate dissertation, Ivan Franko Zhytomyr State University].
Rabinovych, P. (2011). Philosophy of law: some “evergreen” scientific stories. Law of Ukraine, 8, 13–20.
Safronchuk, M. V. (2017). The digital footsteps of the revolution (the fourth industrial revolution and digital transformation). Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, 11(5), 52–56.
Schwab, K. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Eksmo.
Schwab, K., & Davis, N. (2018). Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Bombora; Eksmo.
Tertychnyi, Yа. S. (2021). Determinants of e-commerce development in the conditions of global digitalization [Candidate dissertation, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University].
Vereshchagin, A., Ivanov, A., & Bagaev, V. (2019, May 22). “Artificial intelligence will lead to the wholesale expulsion of a wide layer of lawyers” – an interview with Lawrence Lessig. zakon.ru. https://zakon.ru/discussion/2019/05/22/iskusstvennyj_intellekt_privedyot_k_massovomu_izgnaniyu_shirokogo_plasta_yuristov__intervyu_s_louren.
Zaikin, A. P. (2021). Digitization of the judiciary: theoretical and legal aspect [Candidate dissertation, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs].
Zaloilo, M. V., & Pashentsev, D. A. (2019). National law and order of Russia in the conditions of digitalization. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 10(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.201.
Copyright (c) 2021 Emin Najafli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.