Prosecuting child soldiers: legal consequences of the participation of children in the Colombian conflict

Keywords: Child soldiers, prosecution, Colombia, armed conflict, transitional justice.

Abstract

Children have been widely used as pawns in the Colombian armed conflict. International conventions on children’s rights view child soldiers solely as victimized and traumatized; criminalizing the use of children under the age of fifteen in active hostilities. This paper aims to approximate the reality of Colombian child soldiers, versus the approach taken in other jurisdictions, where child soldiers have been the prosecuted in situations of armed conflict.  In making this approximation, we attempt to answer the question of whether it is lawful to prosecute former child soldiers in post-conflict Colombia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

L. C. Gamarra-Amaya, Universidad Catolica de Colombia

LL.M.

References

Arboleda, C. I., Baquero, M. C., & Domínguez, M. P. (2010). La inimputabilidad del menor en el sistema penal colombiano. Universitas estudiantes, 7, 157–174.

Aptel, C. (2010). Children and accountability for international crimes: the contribution of international criminal courts. UNICEF. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/617-children-and-accountability-for-international-crimes-the-contribution-of-international.html.

Beber, B., & Blattman, C. (2013). The Logic of Child Soldiering and Coercion. International Organization, 67(1), 65–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000409.

Carmona, J. A., Moreno, F., & Tobón, F. (2011). La carrera de las niñas en los grupos guerrilleros y paramilitares de colombia: un estudio desde el punto de vista del agente. Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó. http://www.funlam.edu.co.

Congreso de la República de Colombia (2000). LEY 599 DE 2000. https://www.procuraduria.gov.co/guiamp/media/file/MacroprocesoDisciplinario/Codigo_Penal_L-599-00.htm.

Echeverri Uruburu, Á. (2007). Orígenes y desarrollo de la violencia en Colombia. IUSTA, 1(26). https://doi.org/10.15332/s1900-0448.2007.0026.08.

Franco Castellanos, A. D. (2015). Confrontacion entre las disposiciones de la jurisdiccion especial para la paz y las obligaciones del estado con la ratificacion del estatuto de roma. Universidad Católica de Colombia. https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstream/10983/14459/4/JEP y Obligaciones del Estado frente al estatuto de roma.pdf.

Giovanna, T., Barrera, V., Cubides, J., Gait, M., Gu, R. E., Alfonso, C., Mart, J., & Wabgou, M. (2016). Derechos humanos, paz y posconfl icto en Colombia. Bogotá. www.ucatolica.edu.co.

Ignacio Arboleda, C., Carolina Baquero, M., & Paulina Domínguez, M., (2010). La Inimputabilidad Del Menor en el Sistema Penal Colombiano. Universitas Estudiantes, 7, 157–174.

Palou-Loverdos, J. (2018). Memoria y justicia transicional en los acuerdos de paz de Colombia. Novum Jus, 12(2), 113–130. http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/Juridica/article/view/1539.

Poder Legislativo, Colombia (2016). Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera, disponible en esta dirección. https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5a8744d54.html.

Quénivet, N. (2017). Does and should international law prohibit the prosecution of children for war crimes? European Journal of International Law, 28(2), 33–455.

Ruiz, A. F. (2018, de febrero 24). Salidas al lío de la justicia penal para menores en Colombia. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/delitos/alternativas-de-justicia-penal-para-menores-de-edad-en-colombia-186812.

Schabas, W. A. (2002). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press.

Waldmann, P. (2007). Is There a Culture of Violence in Colombia? International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 1, 61–75. http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/21/21.

Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Gamarra-Amaya, L. C. (2022) “Prosecuting child soldiers: legal consequences of the participation of children in the Colombian conflict”, Law and Safety, 85(2), pp. 131-139. doi: 10.32631/pb.2022.2.12.