The definition of the state value in terms of functional quintessence
Abstract
The article examines the issue of the quintessence of the State's axiology in terms of functional definition. For the purpose of the study, the scientific issue is divided into components which are the substantive elements of the scientific problem. First of all, the issue of the essence of the State as a legal phenomenon is revealed, which is the main basis for the emergence of the scientific problem. The relevant views of scholars on the definition of the State are also considered. It has been concluded that the State is a sovereign, political and territorial organisation of society, on the territory of which there are authorities, legal system and taxation system, as well as other additional elements. The author further provides the features inherent in the State which constitute its ontology.
Based on a comprehensive analysis of the essence of the concept of “state”, the article presents some theories of the origin of the state which reflect the purpose of its emergence and existence. The most common theories of the origin of the State include: patriarchal, contractual, violence, organic, and psychological. After analysing some of the theories, the author concludes that the purpose of the State’s emergence and existence is to unite society, resolve disputes and develop it.
The quintessence and diversity of the functions of the State are analysed. As a result, it has been concluded that the functions of the State are a set of activities and processes whose impact is directed at society. Differentiation of functions also has different manifestations. Some scholars distinguish between basic and additional functions, some – internal and external. Internal functions include, for example, regulatory, defence, etc., while external functions include diplomatic and economic (in the context of foreign activities). Based on the analysis of the functions of the State which reflect the directions of its influence on society and which are regulatory in nature (and the very essence of the State is organisational in nature), the article concludes that the axiology of the State in terms of the functional definition is to organise society with the help of its inherent properties and to regulate social relations on the basis of its existing functions with a view to social development.
Downloads
References
Clark, G., & Moonen, Т. (2016). Cities and nation states. The story so far. In G. Clark, Т. Moonen, World Cities and Nation States (pp. 19–32). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119216452.ch2.
Dzhuraieva, O. O. (2005). Classification of functions of the modern state. Current Problems of State and Law, 25, 140–145.
Garland, D. (2013). Penalty and the penal state. Criminology, 51(3), 475–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12015.
Gumplowicz, L. (1926). History of state theories. Wagner University Publishing House.
Hladky, S. O. (2016). The Theory of the State and Law. Poltava.
Holovatyi, M. F., & Antoniuk, O. V. (2005). Political Science Dictionary. MAUP.
Husarieva, S. D., & Tykhomyrova, O. D. (2017). The Theory of the State and Law. NAIA; Education of Ukraine.
Kukhtyk, S. V. (2015). Transformation of the state under the influence of globalization [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Landau, S. F., & Pfeffermann, D. (1988). A time series analysis of violent crime and its relation to prolonged state of warfare: the Israeli case. Criminology, 26(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00852.x.
Leheza, Yu. O. (2012). Functions of the State as the Content of Its Essence. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 68–75.
Melnychuk, S. M. (2019). Legal forms of realization of the functions of the modern state of Ukraine [Doctoral dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Mernyk, A. M., & Yarova, A. S. (2019). Concepts of state and state: content and their relationships (historical and legal aspects). Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 3, 19–22. http://www.lsej.org.ua/3_2019/5.pdf.
Miroshnychenko, M. (2007). Genesis of national legal systems: theoretical and methodological aspect. University “Ukraine”.
Miroshnychenko, M. I. (2010). Theoretical and methodological foundations of the genesis of the legal system of Ukraine. University “Ukraine”.
Norkus, Z. (2016). The Unproclaimed Empire: The Grand Duchy of Lithuania from the Perspective of the Comparative-Historical Sociology of the Empire (P. Bilynskyi, Transl.). Criticism.
North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingest, B. (2017). Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History (T. Tsymbal, Transl.). Our format.
Oleinikov, S. M. (2013). Functions of the State: methodological components and development in a globalizing. State Building and Local Government, 25, 75–87.
Shevtsov, S. (2011). The theory of the natural state: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Sententiae, 25(2), 70–83.
Skakun, O. F. (2009). The Theory of Law and State. Alerta.
Steffensmeier, D., Zhong, H., & Lu, Y. (2017). Age and its relation to crime in Taiwan and the United States: invariant, or does cultural context matter? Criminology, 55(2), 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12139.
Sukhonos, V. V. (2002). The Theory of the State and Law. Initiative.
Thomas, D., Karen, H., & Joseph, B. (2005). Partisan politics, electoral competition and imprisonment. Criminology, 43(1), 211–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00007.x.
Varych, O. H. (2006). Economic functions of the modern state: nature, content, development trends in Ukraine [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Vediernikov, Yu. A. (2015). The Theory of the State and Law. Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs.
Copyright (c) 2024 S. G. Pevko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
