Legal liability: seven doctrinal approaches to understanding its essence
Abstract
The article provides a critical analysis of the civil law doctrine of understanding the “legal liability” category. Seven main approaches to the interpretation of the category under study are identified and their advantages and disadvantages are highlighted. The author concludes that neither current legislation nor legal doctrine is consistent on the issue under study.
The author emphasises that the doctrine of legal theory distinguishes two types of legal liability: positive (relating to an offence not yet committed) and negative (relating to an offence already committed). The critical analysis of this approach is that such different legal phenomena as proper performance of duties and liability for their violation cannot be covered by the same legal concept – “liability”. As a result, the author makes a reservation that positive responsibility can be spoken of as a type of social liability, but not legal one. Thus, in the context of civil relations, legal liability should be referred to as negative liability. Positive liability is rather a moral phenomenon, which consists in the subject's conscientious (responsible) fulfilment of all legal principles.
Based on the analysis of the doctrinal approaches to understanding the category of “legal liability” and their critical assessment in the legal literature, it has been noted that it is inappropriate to formulate a universal (generally accepted) definition of the concept under study today. This assertion is based on the fact that in many cases, experts seek to combine numerous and diverse features of legal liability into a definition which leaves out specific manifestations of various aspects of its phenomenon.
It has been proved that the current doctrinal approaches to the understanding of legal liability can be reduced to two main areas: its study as a form of state coercion/influence or as a protective legal relationship.
Downloads
References
Baulin, Yu. V. (Ed.). (2013). Legal liability: problems of exclusion and release. Kalmius Publishing House.
Bytiak, Yu. P., Barabash, Yu. H., Baranova, L. M. et al. (2014). Problems of legal responsibility (V. Ya. Tatsii, A. P. Hetnam, & V. I. Borysova, Eds). Right.
Fairchild, H. P. (1960). Dictionary of Sociology and Related Sciences. Adams.
Hornby, A. S. (1998). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press.
Kanzafarova, I. S. (2006). Theory of civil liability. Astroprynt.
Kanzafarova, I. S. (2007). Theoretical foundations of civil liability in Ukraine [Doctoral dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Karnaukh, B. P. (2012). The essence and phenomenon of civil liability. Journal of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 287–299.
Karnaukh, B. P. (2014). Guilt as a condition of civil liability. Right.
Kharytonov, Ye. O., & Kharytonova, O. I. (2020). Updating (codification and recodification) of civil legislation of Ukraine: experience, problems and prospects. Phoenix.
Kharytonov, Ye., & Kharytonova, O. (2010). Legal responsibility: the search for a paradigm. About Ukrainian Law, 5, 23–30.
Kivalova, T. (2010). Non-contractual civil liability as a type of legal liability. About Ukrainian Law, 5, 213–222.
Kivalova, T. S. (2008). The obligation to compensate for damage under the civil law of Ukraine: theoretical problems [Doctoral dissertation, Odesa National Law Academy].
Kravchuk, V. M. (2005). Corporate law. Scientific and practical commentary on legislation and judicial practice. Truth.
Luts, V. V. (2008). Contracts in entrepreneurial activity (2nd ed.). Yurinkom Inter.
Lysenkov, S. L., & Kopeichykov, V. V. (Eds). (2002). Theory of the state and law. Yurinkom Inter.
Marchenko, M. (2010). Problems of legal and socio-political responsibility of business. About Ukrainian Law, 5, 62–69.
Milovska, N. V. (2019). Contractual insurance obligations in the civil law of Ukraine: problems of theory and practice. NDIPPP.
Nadon, V. V. (2016, May 27). Correlation of subjective civil duty and civil-legal responsibility [Conference presentation abstract]. Scientific and Practical Conference “Problems of civil law and process”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Nadon, V. V. (2019, February 22). Correlation of the “sanction” and “civil liability” categories [Conference presentation abstract]. XVII Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of private law”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Petryshyn, O. V., Lukianov, D. V., Maksymov, S. I. et al. (2020). General theory of law (O. V. Petryshyn, Ed.). Right.
Prymak, V. D. (2005). Civil liability of legal entities [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Prymak, V. D. (2007). Civil liability of legal entities. Yurinkom Inter.
Savytska, A. M., Luts, V. V., Romovska, Z. V. et al. (1975). Legal responsibility (civil aspects) (N. I. Tytova, Ed.). High school.
Shcherbyna, V. S. (Ed.). (2012). Actual problems of economic law. Yurinkom Inter.
Shyshka, R. B. (Ed.). (2015). Civil law of Ukraine. A special part. Lira-K.
Shyshka, R. B., & Shyshka, O. R. (2012). Civil liability and tort liability. University Scientific Notes, 1, 271–280.
Verkhovets, A. A. (2010). Civil liability for breach of contract [Candidate thesis, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].
Yefremova, I. O. (2017). Liability measures in family law [Candidate dissertation, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs].
Copyright (c) 2024 V. H. Zhornokui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
