Appointment of forensic examinations in the course of investigation of criminal offences related to raiding
Abstract
Establishment and development of the economic security of the state requires taking effective measures to counteract and minimise the negative impact of criminal offences that encroach on public relations in the areas of economic activity, legal activities of business entities, professional activities of public administration entities, etc. Among such criminal offences, much attention is paid to those with signs of raiding, i.e. those related to the unlawful takeover and seizure of property, assets of enterprises, institutions, organisations, corporate rights to them and other resources, encroachment on the rights of owners or authorised persons of business entities of various forms of ownership, etc. An important role in proving and clarifying the circumstances to be proved in these criminal offences is played by expert opinions. Given the insufficient elaboration of the issues related to the appointment of forensic examinations in the course of investigation of criminal offences related to raiding, the purpose of the article is to define the range of forensic examinations which are appointed during the pre-trial investigation of the latter, and to clarify the specifics of their appointment. To achieve this goal, the article uses a range of general scientific methods, as well as some philosophical and special research methods, in particular, analysis, synthesis, systemic and structural method, forecasting method and dialectical method.
Based on the results of the analysis of the investigative and judicial practice of investigating criminal offences related to raiding, it has been found that the typical expert examinations which are appointed during their investigation are forensic technical examination of a document, forensic economic examination, and forensic handwriting examination. It has been generalised that they are appointed in every second criminal proceeding of the type under study.
The author identifies the factors which should be taken into account when deciding on the necessity and expediency of appointing a forensic examination during a pre-trial investigation. The article also identifies the mistakes made by the prosecution when appointing the specified types of qualified specialised investigations. Given the nature of raiders’ actions, the processes taking place in society and in the professional activities of individual participants in social relations, the author outlines the prospects for further scientific research.
Downloads
References
Bezsonna, T. F., & Zubtsova, L. S. (2021). Problems of Commissioning of Technical Expert Examination of Documents. Law and Safety, 1(80), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2021.1.10.
Briukhan, S. F. (2021, April 15–16). Problematic issues of preparation of materials for forensic handwriting examinations [Conference presentation abstract]. International Science and Practice Polylogue Conference “Actual issues of forensic examination and forensics”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Dudorov, O. O., Kamenskyi, D. V., & Tytarenko, S. S. (2021). Criminal Law Assessment of Abuses of State Registrars in the Context of Counteracting Raiding. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1(26), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.33270/01211181.118.
Fabuš, M. (2017). Current development of business environment in Slovakia and Czech Republic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(10).
Kamlyk, M. I., Pohoretskyi, M. A., & Shelomentsev, V. P. (2007). Raiding in Ukraine: essence and countermeasures. Combating Organized Crime and Corruption (Theory and Practice), 17, 69–88.
Kikinchuk, V. V., & Husieva, V. O. (2020). Peculiarities of the investigation of criminal offenses related to illegal takeover and seizure of enterprises, agricultural lands, violation of the rights of their legitimate owners (raiding): scientific and methodological recommendations. KhNUIA.
Kimaro, J., Bukombe, J., Leweri, C., Kakengi, V., Ntalwila, J., Mwakatobe, A., Lowassa, A., Kilimba, N., Marealle, W., Lobora, A., & Keyyu, J. (2023). Sociocultural Factors Shaping Responses to Wildlife Crop-Raiding in Communities Adjacent to Protected Areas in Southern Tanzania. Human Ecology, 51, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00373-x.
Kubariev, I., & Barhan, S. (2022). Typical Investigative Situations of the Initial Stage of Corporate Raids Investigation. Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie, 3(35), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20220305.
Shramko, O. M. (2021). Use of special knowledge in the investigation of corruption offenses [Candidate dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Tkachenko, Ya., & Ivanko, Ye. (2022). Study of handwritten records and signatures in technical examination of documents. Young Scientist, 1(101), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2022-1-101-45.
Tsutskiridze, M. S., Dudarets, R. M., Dovhun, S. Z. et al. (2021). Investigation of criminal offenses related to illegal takeover and seizure of enterprises, agricultural lands, violation of the rights of their legal owners (raiding). 7BTs.
Urbig, D., Weitzel, U., Rosenkranz, S., & Wittenloostuijn van, A. (2012). Exploiting opportunities at all costs? Entrepreneurial intent and externalities Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.003.
Vorobei, O. V., Melnykov, I. M., & Voloshyn, O. H. (2008). Technical and forensic investigation of documents. Center for Educational Literature.
Yakimiva, V. S., & Tkach, N. I. (2022, May 3–6). Subject, modern tasks and actual problems of forensic economic examination in wartime conditions in Ukraine [Conference presentation abstract]. XVII International Scientific and Practical Conference “Multidisciplinary academic notes. Theory, methodology and practice”, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuzyshina, T. (2023). Problems in conducting forensic handwriting examination in the identification study of handwriting and signatures in electronic documents. Expert: Paradigm of Law and Public Administration, 1(25), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2023-1(25)-56-61.
Copyright (c) 2024 S. A. Tiulieniev
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.