Grounds and conditions for the application of preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation of corruption criminal offenses

Keywords: preventive measures, pre-trial investigation, corruption criminal offenses, criminal proceedings, application of preventive measures, grounds, conditions.

Abstract

The article is devoted to clarifying the content of the grounds and conditions for the application of preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation of corruption criminal offenses. The specified scientific search was carried out taking into account the specifics of the mechanism of commission and, accordingly, investigation of the selected category of criminal offenses. The main purpose of the study is to identify and characterize the grounds and conditions for applying preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation of corruption criminal offenses. It is proved that during the pre-trial investigation of corruption criminal offenses, preventive measures are applied only if there are legal and procedural grounds. The legal basis is the existence of a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed a corruption criminal offense and risks that give the investigating judge sufficient grounds to believe that the suspect may not fulfill the procedural duties assigned to him and try to hide from the pre-trial investigation bodies, commit actions to destroy or damage evidentiary information, illegally influence other participants in the criminal proceedings, or otherwise obstruct criminal proceedings, or continue criminal illegal activities. It is emphasized that when deciding on the application of preventive measures in the category of criminal proceedings under study, it is necessary to clarify the presence of risks stipulated in Part 2 of Article 177 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and justify their sufficiency in relation to the elements of the mechanism of committing a specific corruption criminal offense. The procedural basis is the ruling of the investigating judge at the request of the investigator, agreed with the prosecutor, or the prosecutor. If the corruption criminal offense is attributed to the jurisdiction of the High Anti-Corruption Court, then the procedural basis for applying preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation of such offenses is the ruling of the investigating judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court. Such a ruling is made at the request of the investigator, agreed with the prosecutor of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, or at the request of the prosecutor of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office. When making a procedural decision, the investigating judge is obliged to take into account the conditions for applying preventive measures in criminal proceedings: the presence of evidence of circumstances indicating the presence of both components of the legal basis for applying preventive measures and the insufficiency of applying milder preventive measures to prevent the risk or risks specified in the request; ensuring the legality of restrictions on the suspect’s rights during criminal proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. V. Romaniuk, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Educational and Scientific Institute No. 1.

References

Ablamskyi, S., Nenia, O., Drozd, V., & Havryliuk, L. (2021). Substantial Violation of Human Rights and Freedoms as a Prerequisite for Inadmissibility of Evidence. Justicia, 26(39), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.26.39.4819.

Bandurka, O., Blazhivskyi, Ye., Burdol, Ye. et al. (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (Vol. 1). (V. Tatsii, V. Pshonka, & A. Portnov, Eds). Pravo.

Bernaziuk, Ya. (2020, October 22). The category of “quality of law” as a component of the principle of the rule of law and a guarantee of the application by the court of the interpretation of the law most favorable to the individual. The Judiciary of Ukraine. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/zmi/1011199.

Butenko, V. (2019). Concepts and reasons for selecting preventive measures. Law and Innovations, 3(27), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.31359/2311-4894-2019-27-3-118.

Fomina, T. (2016). Epistemological characteristics of preventive measures in the context of the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific Journal of Public and Private Law, 2(3), 241–244.

Fomina, T. (2020). Application of preventive measures in criminal proceedings: problems of theory and practice (O. Yukhno, Ed.). Panov.

Goshovska, Yu. (2015). The use of preventive measures in a criminal proceeding on minors. Scientific Herald of International Humanitarian University, 17(2), 143–146.

Hloviuk, I., & Stepanenko, A. (2018). Standard of proof “reasonable suspicion” in criminal proceedings. Legal Position, 1(20), 13–20.

Hloviuk, I., Zhovtan, Yu., & Ponomarenko, D. (2020, February 20). Verification by the investigating judge of the validity of suspicion as a means of counteracting unfounded criminal prosecution. National Bar Association of Ukraine. https://unba.org.ua/publications/5251-perevirka-slidchim-suddeyu-obuntovanosti-pidozri-yak-zasib-protidii-neobuntovanomu-kriminal-nomu-peresliduvannyu.html.

Hroshevyi, Yu., Tatsii, V., Tumaniants, A. et al. (2013). Criminal process (V. Tatsii, Yu. Hroshevyi, V. Kaplina, & O. Shylo, Eds). Pravo.

Kokosh, R. (2020, October 27). Reasonableness of suspicion: criteria and their interpretation in practice. Legal Newspaper Online. https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/obruntovanist-pidozri-kriteriyi-i-yih-tlumachennya-na-praktici.html.

Oliinyk, O. (2019). Principles of criminal law in the light of the practice of the ECHR. Law and Society, 4, 254–260. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736-2019-4-38.

Pavlyshyn, A., & Slyusarchuk, Kh. (2018). Standard of proof “probable cause”: interpretation of the supreme court of the USA and national practice of applying. Legal Position, 1(20), 103–110.

Pohoretskyi, M., & Mitskan, O. (2019b). Standard of proof «sufficient reason» in the criminal procedure of Ukraine. Herald of Criminal Justice, 3, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/31-42.

Pohoretskyi, M., & Mitskan, O. (2019a, March 21). “Reasonable Suspicion”: An Unrecognized Phenomenon of Ukrainian Criminal Procedure. Law and Business. https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/136819-yak_minimum_5_kriteriiv_obruntovanosti_pidozri_mae_vrahovuva.html.

Titko, I. (2010). Evaluative concepts in the criminal procedural law of Ukraine. Pravo.

Tsebenko, S. (2021). Requirement of “quality” of the law as one of the main aspects of the principle of the rule of law. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 4, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2021.4.6.

Vakulenko, O., Drozd, V., Ponomarenko, A. et al. (2017). Procedural features of the application of preventive measures during pre-trial investigation. Helvetyka.

Published
2024-12-28
How to Cite
Romaniuk, V. V. and Login, R. I. (2024) “Grounds and conditions for the application of preventive measures during the pre-trial investigation of corruption criminal offenses”, Law and Safety, 95(4), pp. 105-115. doi: 10.32631/pb.2024.4.09.