Concept of effective Control among the Means of Restoring National Security of Ukraine
Abstract
The sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine have been violated for more than seven years, part of the territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea are temporarily not under the control of the sovereign. Researchers and reintegration experts pay attention to the categories of effective and general control in these circumstances. Both concepts from the point of view of historical and law-making importance have significantly influenced the development of international public law and the state responsibility institution involved in armed conflicts, but accomplish this not directly, but through third parties of the conflict: a state controls the behavior of individuals or groups of individuals on the territory of another state. It is possible to appropriate the actions of individuals to the state through the concepts of state and effective control at the international level, although such evidence is extremely difficult in some cases, since the relationship is carefully concealed and the state denies its involvement in international armed conflict. The establishment and recognition of such a relationship between a state and a person or a group of persons, as well as the disclosure of the causal link between governmental actions and the conduct of individuals becomes the subject matter of proving at the international level in case of applying the concepts of effective and general control. In particular, the United Nations International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights are actively working with the concepts of effective and general control to deal with cases of violating human rights, international humanitarian law on the territories of armed conflict.
All this determines the relevance of the research of these concepts for their subsequent practical application to prove the fact of involvement of certain subjects of international law in armed conflicts. In this aspect, the development of the concept of effective or general control can facilitate the solution of topical issues of Ukraine’s domestic and foreign policy. The analysis of this concept can be taken as arguments that the conflict in Ukraine should be classified as international, armed aggression of the Russian Federation is being carried out against Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Malyha V. and Novashok D., 2017. Concepts of effective and general control in international law: theory and practice [Kontseptsii efektyvnoho ta zahalnoho kontroliu u mizhnarodnomu pravi: teoriia ta praktyka]. Vìsnik Lʹvìvsʹkogo unìversitetu – Visnyk of the Lviv University, Iss. 42, pp. 191-200.
Novashok D.O., 2018. Concepts of effective and general control in international law: theory and practice [Kontseptsii efektyvnoho ta zahalnoho kontroliu u mizhnarodnomu pravi: teoriia ta praktyka]. Odesa. Available at http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/9758/erga%20omnes.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 16 May 2021].
Melnychuk O.S., Kolomiiets V.T. and Tkachenko O.B. (eds), 1985. Etymological dictionary of the Ukrainian language [Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy]: in 7 vols. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Sassoli M. and Ol`son L., 2000. Decision of the ICTY Appeals Chamber on the merits of the Tadich case [Reshenie Apellyatsionnoi kamery MUTYu po sushchestvu dela Tsdicha]. Meždunarodnyj žurnal Krasnogo Kresta, No. 2, pp. 165-178.
Mezokh M.M., 2012. International legal responsibility of the state for the actions of individuals [Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya otvetstvennost gosudarstva za deistviya individov]. Istoričeskie, filosofskie, političeskie i ûridičeskie nauki, kulʹturologiâ i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, No. 3, part 2, pp. 121-123.
Borysiuk R.R., 2016. On some issues of "self-proclaimed" state-like entities [Shchodo deiakykh pytan "samoproholoshenykh" derzhavopodibnykh utvoren]. In: Hetman A.P., Yakoviuk I.V., Samoshchenko V.I. et al. Current issues of modern international law [Aktualni problemy suchasnoho mizhnarodnoho prava]: in 2 parts. Part 1. Kharkiv, 21 November. Kharkiv. Pp. 230-233.
Copyright (c) 2021 O. V. Cherviakova, R. V. Sytnyk, M. M. Honcharenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.