Digital thing as a “new” object of “new” civil legal relations

A. S. Slipchenko; S. O. Slipchenko

doi:10.32631/pb.2023.4.06

A. S. Slipchenko Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-4951
S. O. Slipchenko Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-7152

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.4.06

Keywords: object of civil rights, virtual asset, digital thing, information, results of intellectual and creative activity, Internet legal relations, electronic legal relations, IT legal relations.

Abstract

The article is devoted to theoretical comprehension and establishment of the concept of digital things as “new” objects of “new” civil legal relations which is proposed to be introduced into the civil legislation of Ukraine. It is obvious that in case of emergence of any new objects of civil rights which have become a prerequisite for the emergence of previously unknown relations, there is a need to establish an appropriate legal regime for such goods. Otherwise, the whole type of civil relations will remain unregulated, and this will have a negative impact not only on civil turnover, but will also create conditions for an increase in the number of violations of subjective rights. Therefore, the author analyses the legal relations which arise in the “digital environment” and which are proposed to be considered as new ones in the legal literature, and examines the objects of civil rights in such legal relations. The study concludes that the legal relations arising in the “digital environment” are fully covered by the already known types of civil legal relations and are not new in comparison with the existing ones, and a digital thing is not a new object of civil rights. It is just a new and additional name for long-known and even traditional objects of civil rights, including services, property rights, information, results of intellectual and creative activity, tradable objects of personal non-property legal relations, etc. The only peculiarity of virtual objects is that they are created and provided with the help of digital technologies, an Internet resource. It has been established that an online account is not an object of civil rights at all. It is only the result of recording data in the form of a digital code that allows computer equipment to identify, recognise a particular user and the limits of his/her access to certain Internet resources. A persistent computer (digital, electronic, software) code that is recorded in a database and located (stored) on a server is not an independent object of civil rights, but is only a record.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A. S. Slipchenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Law.
Department of Civil Law and Procedure.

S. O. Slipchenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Doctor of Law, Professor.
Department of Civil Law Disciplines.

References

Baadzhy, N. P. (2017). Legal nature of legal relations on the Internet. Journal of Civil Studies, 22, 112–116.

Baranov, A. A. (2013). Internet: object of legal relations and subject of regulation. Law of Ukraine; Right.

Bieliakov, K. I. (2016). The Conceptual and Methodological Bases of Regulation the New Types of Information Relations: “Virtual Legal Relationships”. Lex Portus, 2, 47–63.

Blazer, C. (2006). The five indicia of virtual property. Pierce Law Review, 5, 137–161.

Buletsa, S. B. (2022). Virtual property in the metaverse as an object of civil rights. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 72(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.72.21.

Bytiak, O. Yu. (2015). Legal regulation of joint ventures related to the Internet. Problems of Legality, 129, 198–207.

Donets, A. H. (2023). Contract оf Custody оf Virtual Assets (Cryprto Custody) According to the Legislation of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(22), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2022.2.267943.

Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047−1102.

Fedosenko, N. A. (2022). Use of digital technologies in civil legal relations. Journal of Civil Studies, 45, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.32837/chc.v0i45.469.

Haller, S. (2010, November 29 – December 1). The Things in the Internet of Things. Poster paper presented at Internet of Things 2010 Conference. Tokyo, Japan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228488111_The_Things_in_the_Internet_of_Things.

Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.

Horobets, N. O., & Maisun, I. V. (2021). Virtual objects, their place in the institute of ownership. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 5, 52–54. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-5/11.

Kārkliņš, J., & Mantrov, V. (2021). The Place of Contract for Digital Thing in Latvian Contract Law Within the Context of the Consumer Sale Directives 2019. Journal of the University of Latvia, 14, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.14.04.

Kharytonov, Ye. O. (2018). The domestic concept of property rights before the challenges of the information society. Journal of Civil Studies, 29, 82–88.

Kharytonov, Ye. O., & Kharytonova, O. I. (2017). “Internet relationships” and “Internet Legal Relationships”: Defining the Concept and Essence. University Scientific Notes, 3, 27–38.

Kokhanovska, O. V. (2017). Private-legal understanding of informatsion relations in Ukraine. Journal of Civil Studies, 22, 128–133.

Kovaliv, M., Yesimov, S., Skrynkovskyi, R., Krasnytskyi, I., Mazur, Yu., Harasym, P., & Kniaz, S. (2021). Features of Legal Relations that Arise on the Internet. Path of Science, 7(3), 1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.68-4.

Kud, А. А. (2020). The Phenomenon of Virtual Assets: Economic and Legal Aspects. International Journal of Education and Science, 3(3), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.26697/ijes.2020.3.3.

Lastowka, G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The Laws of the Virtual Worlds. California Law Review, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3481444.

Lohoida, V. M. (2022). Cryptocurrencies as an objects of civil rights: a comparative legal analysis [Candidate dissertation, Uzhhorod National University].

Maidanyk, R. A. (2022, September 29). Digital thing: concept and legal nature [Conference presentation abstract]. Sixth All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of intellectual, information, IT and Internet law”, Lviv, Ukraine.

Maidanyk, R. A., Maidanyk, N. I., & Popova, N. R. (2022). Digital things. The law of Ukraine is on the way to a broad understanding of the matter. Scientia, 1, 84–88.

Mіchurіn, Ye. (2022). Digital Technology Objects and their Legal Regulation. Copernicus Political and Legal Studies, 1(3), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.15804/CPLS.20223.03.

Nekіt, K. H. (2019). The underlying characteristics of virtual property ownership and usage. Journal of Civil Studies, 32, 86–92.

Nekіt, K. H. (2021). Digital data and information as objects of ownership. Journal of Civil Studies, 42, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.32837/chc.v0i42.433.

Nekіt, K. H. (2022). Virtual assets as a type of digital commodity. Journal of Civil Studies, 45, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.32837/chc.v0i45.466.

Prylypko, S. M., Hetman, A. P., Atamanova, Yu. Ye. et al. (2013). Legal regulation of innovative relations. Yurait.

Rose, K., Eldridge, S., & Chapin, L. (2015). The Internet of Things: An Overview. Understanding the Issues and Challenges of a More Connected World. Internet Society. http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/ISOC-IoT-Overview-20151022.pdf.

Savanets, L. M., & Stakhyra, H. M. (2019). Digital content as an object of copyright law. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 59(1), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-3322.59-1.35.

Shyshka, R., Shyshka, O., Shyshka, N., Slipchenko, A., & Tkalych, M. (2022). Updating civil legislation in accordance with European quality standards: the example of Ukraine. DIXI, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.

Slipchenko, A. S. (2018). On the Need to Define the Concept of “Civil Turnover”. Eurasian Academic Research Journal, 3(21), 46–52.

Slipchenko, A. S. (2023, May 19). Civil circulation of digital content [Conference presentation abstract]. Science and practice conference, dedicated 98th anniversary of the birth of O. A. Pushkin “Problems of civil law and process”, Vinnitsa, Ukraine.

Slipchenko, S. O. (2013). Personal non-property legal relations regarding movable objects. Disa plus.

Slipchenko, S. O. (2015, February 27). System of intangible objects of civil law [Conference presentation abstract]. International science and practice conference dedicated 93rd anniversary from the day of birth of Doctor of law, Professor, Member-correspondent of Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR V. P. Maslova “Actual problems of private law”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Slipchenko, S. O. (2023, May 19). Online account in the civil law of Ukraine [Conference presentation abstract]. Science and practice conference, dedicated 98th anniversary of the birth of O. A. Pushkin “Problems of civil law and process”, Vinnitsa, Ukraine.

Stakhyra, H. (2017). Material and legal problems of the nature of digital content. Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 11, 55–58.

Stakhyra, H. M. (2020). Civil and legal regulation of circulation of digital content [Doctoral dissertation, West Ukrainian National University].

Titova, H. (2021). Settlement relations in the field of electronic commerce. Khmelnytskyi.

Tymoshenko, Ye. A. (2020). The problem of determining the right of virtual property as an object of legal relations. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 3, 264–267. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.3.2020.47.