Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings
Abstract
The relevance and importance of this research is due to the fact that scientific and technological progress and rapid development of information technology in all spheres of public life have significantly influenced the emergence of new types of criminal offences. Criminals are using computer systems and other portable devices to commit unlawful acts with increasing frequency. Today, many criminal offences are being committed with the help of information technology around the world, ranging from simple online fraud to the threat of a territorial act. Therefore, one of the ways to record (document) such illegal activities effectively is to obtain (collect) electronic evidence by law enforcement agencies in criminal proceedings. In this regard, the key role is played by evidence, which helps to form an evidence base that makes it possible to notify a person of suspicion, send an indictment to the court and make a final court decision on the guilt (innocence) of a person in committing a particular criminal offence. Achievement of this objective undoubtedly necessitates a specific legal procedure for seizure of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, which is not yet clearly defined in terms of its collection, leading to numerous cases of courts declaring such evidence inadmissible.
In the course of the scientific research, the author of the article analyses the views of scholars on the interpretation of the concept of electronic evidence; provides the legislative interpretation of this term (unlike the CPC of Ukraine, other procedural codes enshrine the concept of electronic evidence); studies the case law on the issue of electronic evidence being admissible/inadmissible; and identifies the main features of electronic evidence, etc.
Given the fact that the Russian Federation commits war crimes on the territory of Ukraine on a daily basis, the author states the need to collect and record evidence of such crimes from open sources, which will further ensure the prosecution of the perpetrators.
In the course of studying the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, the author applied general scientific and special scientific methods, in particular, dialectical, formal and logical, and comparative legal methods. The interrelated use of these methods allowed for a comprehensive study, where each of these methods was used at a certain stage of the examination of the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings.
Downloads
References
Akhtyrska, N. (2016). The question probative cyberinformation in aspects of international cooperation in criminal proceedings. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 36(2), 123–125.
Alekseev-Protsyuk, D. O., & Bryzkovskaya, O. M. (2018). Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: notions, signs and problem aspects of application. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 2, 247–253.
Brown, S., Ovsyannikov, V. S., & Shynkorenko, S. V. (2019). Application of Electronic Evidence in Corruption Cases: Collection of Training Materials for Judges (N. G. Shuklina, O. P. Ishchenko, Eds). National School of Judges of Ukraine.
Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime (3rd ed.). Published by Elsevier.
Fomina, T. H., & Rachynskyi, O. O. (2023). Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: problematic issues of theory and practice. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 3(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2023.3.43.
Hutsaliuk, M. V., & Antoniuk, P. Ye. (2022). Procedural capacity of using electronic (digital) information as evidence in criminal proceedings. Information and Law, 2(41), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2022.2(41).270373.
Hutsaliuk, M., & Antoniuk, P. (2020). The essence of digital information as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings. Forensis Herald, 33(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.37025/1992-4437/2020-33-1-37.
Hutsaliuk, M., Havlovskyi, V., Khakhanovskyi, V. et al. (2020). The use of electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings: methodological recommendations (2nd ed.). National Academy of Internal Affairs Publishing House.
Kotliarevskyi, O. I., & Kitsenko, D. M. (1998). Computer information as material evidence in a criminal case. Information technology and information protection, 2, 70–79.
Kovalenko, A. (2018). Digital Evidences in Criminal Proceedings: Current State and Prospects for Use. Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko, 4, 237–245.
Kovalenko, A. V. (2022, December 14). Digital or electronic? On the issue of naming a new category of evidence and traces of a criminal offence [Conference presentation abstract]. The Round Table “Application of information technologies in law enforcement”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Muradov, V. V. (2013). Digital evidence: criminalistical aspects of using. Comparative and Analytical Law, 3, 316–313.
Sirenko, O. V. (2019). Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. International Law Herald: Actual Problems of the Present (Theory and Practice), 14, 208–214. https://doi.org/10.33244/2521-1196.14.2019.208-214.
Stefaniv, N. (2022). Judicial practice of the ССС of the Supreme Court on the admissibility of electronic evidence. Supreme Court. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/Prezentatsiia_Stefaniv.pdf.
Vernydubov, I., & Belikova, S. (2018). Electronic evidences: concept, features and problems of their study by the court. European Political and Law Discourse, 5(2), 299–305.
Zakharko, A. (2020). Fixation of evidence in the course of proving. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2020-3-168-173.
Copyright (c) 2024 I. O. Teslenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
