An analysis of the procedural features in instituting preliminary hearing in a criminal case

D. Zh.  Suyunova

doi:10.32631/pb.2020.4.24

D. Zh. Suyunova Tashkent State Law University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1039-4069

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2020.4.24

Keywords: preparation of the case for trial, preliminary hearing, elimination of procedural obstacles, court, the objectives of the preliminary hearing, judge.

Abstract

The introduction of the institution of preliminary hearing into the criminal procedural legislation determines the ability of the court to prepare a criminal case for the main hearing in order to eliminate the gaps made by the preliminary investigation authorities. In this context, the article analyzes the changes in the national criminal procedural legislation concerning the institution of the preliminary hearing in a criminal case; analyzed foreign experience of individual countries on this topic; the essence and objectives of this institution are determined, some features of its effective enforcement are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

D. Zh. Suyunova, Tashkent State Law University

Doctor of Law, Professor. Department of Criminal Procedure Law.

References

Ablamskyi, S., & Tadjibaeva, A. (2021). The Protective Function in Criminal Proceeding of the Role of Lawyers. International Journal of Discoveries and Innovations in Applied Sciences, 1(3), 53-56. http://openaccessjournals.eu/index.php/ijdias/article/view/135/133

Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2005) The criminal process. Oxford University Press.

Bozhieva, V. P. (ed.) (2002) Criminal Procedure: Textbook.

Davies, M., Hazel, C., & Tyrer, J. (2010). Criminal justice. Dorchester.

Golovnenkov, P. & Spitsa, N. (2012). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany: Scientific and practical commentary and translation of the text of the law. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

Lebedev, V. M. (ed). (2020). Scientific and practical commentary to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.

Rakhimova, U. (2020). Delimitation of Computer Information from Other Documents and Material Evidence. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2(8), 494-500.

Ryabinina, T. K. (2013). A preliminary hearing as a means of securing a reasonable time frame for criminal proceedings. State and Law, 2(2), 53-62.

Spencer J. R. (2002). Evidence. In Mireile Delmas-Marty and J. R. Spencer (Ed.) European Criminal Process (pp. 594-641). Cambridge: Un. Press. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam041/2002073784.pdf

Suyunova, D. (2021) On the issue of electronic criminal justice. Scientific School of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of St. Petersburg State University, Moscow, 20(3), 318-322.

Suyunova, D. J. & Bhushan, T. (2021). Ensuring Guarantees of Rights of Participants in Electronic Criminal Proceedings. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3(11), 81-88.

Suyunova, D. J., & Bodhisatva, A. (2021) Prospects for the Institution of Preliminary Hearing in Uzbekistan. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3 (02), 139-143

Vogler, R., & Huber, B. (ed) (2008) Criminal procedure in Europe. Institute for Comparative and International Criminal Law.

Volodina, L. M. (2014). Criminal process: Textbook. allowance.