The obligation of “saksama” in article 16 of the Law on notary positions: a perspective on the principle of diligence in partij deed
Abstract
This study analyzes the implementation of the principle of “due care” as stipulated in Article 16 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary. This principle requires notaries to act with high levels of diligence, honesty, and integrity in carrying out their duties. The objective of this research is to explore the normative, substantive, and practical meanings of the principle of “due care” and to identify challenges in its implementation. Employing normative legal research methods, this study integrates a statutory approach to understand the normative framework of the regulation and a hermeneutic approach to interpret the social context and legislative intent. The analysis technique used is content analysis of legal documents, academic literature, and relevant court decisions.The findings reveal that the implementation of the principle of “due care” faces challenges such as the lack of operational definition, limited technical competence of notaries, and weaknesses in supervisory mechanisms. These issues can lead to varying interpretations and risks of violations by notaries. This study recommends regulatory reforms to clarify the legal boundaries of the “due care” principle, the development of continuous training to enhance notary competence, and the strengthening of technology-based supervision and periodic audits.In conclusion, reforms in regulation, education, and supervision are necessary to ensure the consistent application of the principle of “due care”. This research provides practical and theoretical contributions by offering strategic steps to strengthen the integrity of the notary profession and increase public trust in Indonesia’s legal system.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2008). Indonesian Notary Law: Thematic Interpretation of Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary Office. Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2011). Weaving Thoughts in the World of Notaries & PPAT. CV Citra AdityaBakti. http://repository.narotama.ac.id/id/eprint/1295.
Anand, G., & Syafruddin, S. (2016). Supervision of Notaries in Relation to Compliance in Performing Duties. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v1i1.10.
Catur, R. (2023). Comparison of Legal Systems Related to the Implementation of Cyber Notary in Indonesia with Common Law and Civil Law Systems. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 6(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v6i1.7108.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method. A&C Black.
Irwansyah, I. (2020). Legal Research: Method Choices & Article Writing Practices. Mirra Buana Media. https://opac.fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=8111.
Kamelia, M. (2017). The Role of Notaries in Drafting Credit Agreement Deeds in the Perspective of Positive Law and Islamic Law. Jurnal Akta, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i4.2500.
Koos, S. (2023). The Digitization of Notarial Tasks – A Comparative Overview and Outlook of ‘Cyber Notary’ In Indonesia and Germany. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2023v2n2.1.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sagepublications.
McCorquodale, R., Smit, L., Neely, S., & Brooks, R. (2017). Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2017.2.
Nurwulan, P. (2018). Sharia Banking Contracts and Their Application in Notary Deeds According to the Notary Office Law. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art10.
Paramaningrat Manuaba, I. B., Parsa, I. W., & Ketut Ariawan, I. G. (2018). The Principle of Prudence for Notaries in Drafting Authentic Deeds. Acta Comitas, 3, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i01.p05.
Phelps, T. G., & Pitts, J. A. (1984). Questioning the text: The significance of phenomenological hermeneutics for legal interpretation. Louis ULJ, 29. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/stlulj29&div=23&id=&page=.
Salamah, S., & Iriantoro, A. (2022). The Principle of Prudence and Notary Responsibility in Drafting Deeds Based on Article 16 Paragraph (1) Letter A of the Notary Office Law (Case Study of Decision Number 457 PK/Pdt/2019). Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan, 1(2), 550–574.
Sherman, B. (1988). Hermeneutics in law. The Modern Law Review, 51(3), 386–402.
Sibuea, H. P. (2010). The Principles of the Rule of Law, Policy Regulations, and General Principles of Good Governance. Erlangga. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=9603.
Sundari, E. (2015). Class Action Practices in Indonesia. Cahaya Atma Pustaka. https://balaiyanpus.jogjaprov.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=297339
The, F., & Kawuryan, E. S. (2018). Legal Protection Against Criminalization of Notaries. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 7(2), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2017.7.2.466-487.
Wagner, P. (2023). Mind the Gap(s): Moral Philosophy, International Law, and Interpretative Historical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 26(4), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231164258.
Copyright (c) 2024 H. L. Dinar, R. Sulistyarini, A. Jauharoh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.