Provocation of a Criminal Offence: Issues of Determining the Legal Nature and Normative Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2025.3.02

Keywords:

provocation, criminal offence, corruption, bribery, illicit benefit, control over the commission of a crime, special investigative experiment, tactics.

Abstract

The article is devoted to determining the legal nature of provocation of a criminal offence and developing proposals for an optimal model of legislative regulation of criminal liability for such acts. The binary nature of provocation is established and characterised, combining the features of complicity (in the form of incitement) and involvement – quasi-lawful activity that poses an independent public danger, encroaching on relations in the sphere of justice. Two types of provocation are distinguished: official and civil. Particular attention is paid to the legal assessment of the actions of law enforcement officers in the context of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the distinction between provocation and lawful activity in documenting criminal unlawful behaviour. Amendments and additions to the Criminal Code of Ukraine regarding liability for official and civil provocation are proposed A draft of a new legal norm has been developed – Article 384-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “Official provocation of a criminal offence”, in which official provocation is defined as actions by a law enforcement officer to incite a person to commit a criminal offence with the aim of subsequently bringing that person to criminal liability or blackmailing or discrediting. It is justified that the placement of this article after Article 384 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (“Misleading a court or other authorised body”) is logical, since provocation of a criminal offence, by its generic nature, belongs to law enforcement fictions, which are essentially deception, which subsequently becomes the subject of consideration by the prosecutor (during the approval or drafting of the indictment) and the court (at the trial stage). Arguments are presented in favour of the expediency of excluding Article 370 “Provocation of bribery” from the Criminal Code of Ukraine as redundant in the presence of Article 384-1 de lege ferenda.

It is proposed to supplement Article 27 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with Part 8 as follows: “A person who provokes a criminal offence, that is, incites another person to commit a criminal offence with the aim of subsequently bringing that person to criminal liability or blackmailing or discrediting, is an instigator. Official provocation of a criminal offence shall entail criminal liability only in cases specifically provided for in Article 384-1 of this Code”. This addition is aimed at regulating issues of the normative definition and qualification of civil provocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Yu. V. Orlov, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

    Doctor of Law, Professor.

    Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 

    Department of Criminal Law and Criminology.

  • S. V. Shchebetun, Main Directorate of the National Police in Kharkiv Region

    Special Purpose Police Regiment.

References

Antypov, V. I. (2020, October 22–23). Criminal liability for provocation of a crime [Conference presentation abstract]. International scientific conference “Reforming the criminal legislation of Ukraine: present and future”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Babanly, R., & Tarasenko, O. (2020, October 19). Criteria for indirect provocation to commit a crime: development of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Akbay and Others v. Germany. Judicial and Legal Newspaper. https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/182446-kriteriyi-nepryamoyi-provokatsiyi-na-vchinennyazlochinu-rozvitok-praktiki-yevropeyskogo-sudu-z-prav-lyudini-u-spravi-akbay-and-others-v-germany.

Bernaziuk, Ya. (2024, November 27). Presumption and legal fiction: concepts, features and meanings. Supreme Observer. https://so.supreme.court.gov.ua/authors/146/prezumptsiia-presumption-ta-.

Bilodid, I. K. (Ed.). (1980). Academic Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language (Vol. 10). Naukova dumka.

Brych, L. P. (2016). The application of the European Court of Human Rights as a source of law for evaluation of admissibility and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 253–266.

Coufalová, B. (2016). Police provocation in terms of law of the Czech Republic and the USA. Judicial Review, 68, 796–804.

Dudorov, O. O. (2020). On the prospects of legislative regulation of provocative behavior and its legal consequences. Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 2, 14–56. https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2020.14.217578.

Dudorov, O. O. (2022). Provocation of a crime and criminal law prospects. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 8, 418–423. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-8/95.

Gafurov, M. K. (2023). Collection of evidence through criminal provocation and measures to prevent consolidation. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 5(10), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume05Issue10-11.

Heemeng, H., Ryan, K., & Mazerolle, L. (2022). Situational Crime Prevention (SCP) techniques to prevent and control cybercrimes: A focused systematic review. Computers & Security, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102611.

Karelov, K. Iu. (2019). Special rules for the qualification of provocation of offenses against complicity: separation of provocation from related criminal concepts. Subcarpathian Law Herald, 3(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.32837/pyuv.v2i3(28).376.

Kostenko, O. M., Kvasha, O. O., Siryi, M. I. et al. (2014). Counteraction to crimes in the field of official activities (criminological, criminal law and criminal procedural problems). Naukova dumka.

Lemkin, R. (2008). Speech: «Soviet Genocide in the Ukraine». In L. Y. Luciuk, & L. Grekul (Eds.), Holodomor: Reflections on the Great Famine of 1932–1933 in Soviet Ukraine (pp. 235–242). Kashtan Press.

Navrotskyi, V. O. (1998). Provocation of bribery as a possible way to combat corruption. Journal of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 157–162.

Sokurenko, V. V. (2023, April 12). Russia’s war against Ukraine is a genocide of the Ukrainian people [Conference presentation abstract]. Scientific and practical conference “Crime and countering it in wartime: global, regional, and national dimensions”, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.

Sybal, O. B. (2020). Law enforcement control over the commission of a crime: criminal law aspect. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 3, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2020-3/81.

Yarmysh, N. M. (2017). Provocation of bribery and complicity in corruption crimes: paradoxes of criminal law regulation. Journal of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine, 4/2, 111–116.

Published

2025-10-07

How to Cite

“Provocation of a Criminal Offence: Issues of Determining the Legal Nature and Normative Model” (2025) Law and Safety, 98(3), pp. 16–29. doi:10.32631/pb.2025.3.02.