Sustainable Development Goals as a Component of the National Security System: Legal and Methodological Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2025.3.08Keywords:
national security, legal system of Ukraine, legal regulation, legal mechanisms, sustainable development, Sustainable Development Goals.Abstract
The article examines the place and role of sustainable development goals in the modern national security system of Ukraine. In the context of growing global challenges, military conflicts, climate change, information attacks and socio-economic instability, the integration of sustainable development principles into state security policy is becoming particularly relevant. It is shown that the Sustainable Development Goals cannot be considered in isolation from the security paradigm, since long-term stability is only possible with a comprehensive approach that covers economic, social and environmental dimensions, as well as the legal and institutional mechanisms for ensuring them. Particular attention is paid to the security dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular Goal 16, “Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions”, which most fully reflects the interconnection between security and sustainable development.
International and national regulatory and legal acts that form the legal basis for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ukraine are analysed, in particular: the Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine”, the Decree of the President of Ukraine “On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine for the period until 2030”, the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2020–2027, the Strategy for Environmental Security and Adaptation to Climate Change, the Information Security Strategy, and the National Recovery Plan for Ukraine. It is concluded that, despite the existence of individual strategies, the regulatory and legal framework remains fragmented and needs to be unified.
The article proposes a comprehensive risk-oriented approach to integrating the Sustainable Development Goals into national security policy, combining a systematic analysis of the interrelationships between security and development, indicator-based monitoring of results, and risk forecasting. The novelty of the study lies in identifying specific gaps in legal regulation and proposing a methodological model for assessing the effectiveness of integrating the Sustainable Development Goals into Ukraine’s security policy. It is argued that such an approach makes it possible to move from a declarative level of implementation to the practical realisation of sustainable development principles in the security sector, contributes to enhancing the institutional capacity of the state and the formation of a long-term state strategy focused on preventing complex threats and strengthening democratic institutions.
Downloads
References
Arădăvoaicei, I. A., Bănacu, C.-S., Andreica, M., & Ivan, L. (2023). Composite Indicators Used in Measuring Hybrid Threats. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0081.
Astasheva, O. (2025, March 7). Beijing Platform in Ukraine: effectiveness and consistency of gender policy implementation during 2020–2024. YURFEM. https://jurfem.com.ua/pekinska-platforma-v-ukraini/.
Averianova, N. V., & Voropayeva, T. S. (2020). Information security of Ukraine: socio-philosophical aspects. Young Scientist, 10(86), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2020-10-86-61.
Breuer, A., Leininger, Ju., Malerba, D., & Tosun, J. (2023). Integrated Policymaking: Institutional Designs for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). World Development, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106317.
De Araujo, M. S., Souza Machado, B. A., & Uchoa Passos, Fr. (2024). Resilience in the Context of Cyber Security: A Review of the Fundamental Concepts and Relevance. Applied Sciences, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052116.
Ige, A. B., Kupa, E., & Ilori, O. (2024). Aligning Sustainable Development Goals with Cybersecurity Strategies: Ensuring a Secure and Sustainable Future. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.3.0236.
Khagram, S., Clark, W., & Raad, D. F. (2003). From the Environment and Human Security to Sustainable Security and Development. Journal of Human Development, 4(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000087604.
Kharazishvili, Yu. (2019). Systemic security of sustainable development: assessment tools, reserves and strategic implementation scenarios. Kyiv.
Kolomiiets, B. S. (2024). The evolution of the concept of security: from classical theories to modern approaches. Economics: Time Realities, 6(76), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.15276/ETR.06.2024.5.
Korzh, I. (2019). Safety: Methodological Approaches to the Concept. National Law Journal: Teory and Practice, 4(1), 68–72. http://www.jurnaluljuridic.in.ua/archive/2019/4/part_1/14.pdf.
Lomachinska, I., Ishchuk, M., Chornomordenko, I., Taran, G., Turchyn, M., Martsinko, N., Pasko, K., & Lobanchuk, O. (2025). Hybrid Warfare and Customs Security: Strengthening Resilience for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n2p643.
Malmio, I. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the social dimension of dustainable development: through a security perspective. Discover Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00677-6.
Mhlanga, D., & Ndhlovu, E. (2023). The Implications of the Russia-Ukraine War on Sustainable Development Goals in Africa. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00383-z.
Murphy, E., Walsh, P. P., & Murphy, Eth. (2023, October 16). An evidence-based approach to national Sustainable Development Goal assessment: The case of Ireland. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation. https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000082.
Reznikova, O. (2021). National Resilience in a Changing Security Environment. National Institute for Strategic Studies.
Sokolska, T. V., Polishchuk, S. P., & Sevchenko, K. R. (2025). National Security as a Determining Factor of Sustainable Development in the Context of the Interconnection Between Public Policy and State Institutions. Problems of Modern Transformations. Series: Law, Public Management, 16. https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5746-2025-16-02-25.
Trombetta, M. Ju. (2008). Environmental Security and Climate Change: Analysing the Discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21, 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570802452920.
Wang, D., Hao, M., Li, N., & Jiang, D. (2024). Assessing the impact of armed conflict on the progress of achieving 17 sustainable development goals. iScience, 27(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111331.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. S. Utkina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.