The role and activities of the public in the implementation of anti-corruption reforms
Abstract
The article is devoted to an important and topical issue of legal description of the role and activities of the public in the implementation of anti-corruption reforms.
Countering corruption has always been an important task for Ukraine. It has been proven that the public is the most interested stakeholder in the fight against corruption. It is the members of civil society who want to live in a state governed by the rule of law, where the principles of equality, publicity and transparency are truly in place. And the success of anti-corruption changes depends on the willingness and participation of every member of civil society.
It is noted that civil society involves active participation of citizens in political processes, civil dialogue and various public initiatives. Its main goal is to protect the rights and interests of citizens, as well as to oversee the activities of government agencies and prevent possible abuses.
The legal and numerous doctrinal definitions of the concept of “public” and its components in the context of anti-corruption reforms are analysed.
It is substantiated that the experience of involving the public in the implementation of anti-corruption reforms can be successful only if representatives of public authorities and business are open and transparent.
It is emphasised that citizens and civil society organisations play an important role in combating corruption, as they serve as advocates for the public interest, provide independent oversight, mobilise communities, protect whistleblowers, advocate for policy reforms and promote transparency, accountability and good governance. In particular, citizens are empowered to demand responsibility, act as whistleblowers, influence policy and elections, raise public awareness and promote ethical values. Their participation is essential for the development of transparent, accountable and corruption-free societies. Civil society organisations are also important actors in the anti-corruption fight in Ukraine. Their independent oversight, advocacy, support for whistleblowers, policy analysis and engagement with citizens contribute significantly to the promotion of transparency, accountability and good governance in the country.
Downloads
References
Abdullayev, V. A. (2021). The role of civil society in preventing and combating corruption. Public Administration and Customs Administration, 3(30), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.32836/2310-9653-2021-3.1.
Andreishyna, N. (2023, January 24). Confidence in anti-corruption bodies. Active group. https://activegroup.com.ua/2023/01/24/dovira-do-antikorupcijnix-organiv/.
Bader, M., Gus, O., Meleshevych, A., & Nesterenko, O. (2019). Anti-corruption activities of local public organizations: methods of influence. In O. Nesterenko (Ed.), Civil society vs. corruption in Ukraine (pp. 15–73). SPIRIT AND LETTER.
Basantsov, I. V., & Zubareva, O. O. (2016). Corruption in Ukraine: current realities and effective countermeasures. Sumy State University.
Bondarenko, O. S. (2021). The concept of criminal and legal anti-corruption. Sumy State University.
De Vries, C. E., & Solaz, H. (2017). The Electoral Consequences of Corruption. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111917.
Elers, B., Giannakopoulos, A., & Tänzler, D. (2010). Citizens’ Participation and Anti-Corruption: the Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres of Transparency International and the EU-funded Research Project ‘ALACs’. In S. Wolf (Ed.), Anti-Corruption Regimes in Europe: Between Corruption, Integration, and Culture (pp. 179–194). Nomos-Verl.
Golden, M. (2010). Puzzles of political corruption in modern advanced democracies. In H. Magara (Ed.), Democracy and Accountability: Globalized Political Responsibility (pp. 184–199). Fukosha.
Ilienok, T. V. (2013). Combating corruption: international experience. Juridical Science, 2, 71–77.
Kablak, P. I. (2014). Some considerations regarding the definition of the concept of “public” in the context of establishing relations with the judiciary. Scientific notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, 12, 186–189.
Köbis, N. C., Iragorri-Carter, D., & Starke, C. (2018). A Social Psychological View on the Social Norms of Corruption. In: I. Kubbe, A. Engelbert (Eds), Corruption and Norms. Political Corruption and Governance (pp. 31–52). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_3.
Mincigrucci, R., & Mazzoni, M. (2020, August 24–28). Civil Society and Corruption: Changes and Challenges. In ECPR General Conference 2020. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PanelDetails/9960.
Motolinia, L. (2021). Electoral Accountability and Particularistic Legislation: Evidence from an Electoral Reform in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000672.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2022). Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index. Regulation and Governance, 17(4), 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12502.
Mykhailenko, V. (2022, October 10). Whistleblower participation in criminal proceedings through the prism of court practice. Legal Newspaper Online. https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/uchast-vikrivacha-u-kriminalnomu-provadzhenni-kriz-prizmu-sudovoyi-praktiki.html.
Myloserdna, I. M. (2019). The participation of civil society in combating corruption: experience of Central and Eastern European Countries. Political Life, 3, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2019.3.6.
Nesterenko, O., Biletskyi, A., & Bader, M. (2019). The influence of local public organizations on the implementation of anti-corruption reforms in the regions of Ukraine. Summary of the monitoring report 12/2019. https://wiki.nazk.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/zvit-210x210-1e.pdf.
Okafor, O. N., Adebisi, F. A., Opara, M., & Okafor, C. B. (2020). Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1335–1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2018-3780.
Onyshchuk, I. I. (2018). The methods of increasing quality and efficiency of influence of civil society institutions on the normal projecting of government authorities. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, 4(6), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.149740.
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. et al. (1998). Law encyclopedia (Vol. 1). Ukrainian encyclopedia.
Toleikienė, R., Balciunas, S., & Juknevičienė, V. (2020). Youth Attitudes Towards Intolerance to Corruption in Lithuania. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.46585/sp28020109.
Trepak, V. M. (2020). Civil society institutions as subjects of combating corruption in Ukraine. Scientific notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences, 31(4), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.32838/1606-3716/2020.4/33.
Vian, T., Agnew, B., & McInnes, K. (2022). Whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organizations in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Global Health Action, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2140494.
Yatskiv, I. Ya. (2021). Public appraisals of projects and current legal acts of public administration bodies of Ukraine as an instrument for their effectiveness provision. Investment: Practice and Experience, 18, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2021.18.125.
Copyright (c) 2024 O. S. Bondarenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
